|
Replies:
4
-
Last Post:
Feb 2, 2007 10:24 AM
by: casper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Expectations of Open Solaris
Posted:
Feb 2, 2007 9:04 AM
|
|
[No Body]
|
|
|
Christopher Mahan
chris_mahan@yahoo.com
|
|
|
|
On Expectations of Open Solaris
Posted:
Feb 2, 2007 9:04 AM
in response to: Guest
|
|
--- Casper.***@Sun.COM wrote:
> > > >Casper, Thanks for that tidbit. > > > >Would you mind exploring that a bit further? I'm now very > confused... > >OpenSolaris is not a Kernel, not a distro, but something in > between? > >Explain please... And if you can, make comparisons to well-known > >products... > > > it's a collection of source code repositories each of which are > generally found in Solaris, are developed for Solaris or indicate > future directions of Solaris. > > opensolaris.org is the focal point of development of those bits > of source code. > > > I'm not sure what you expected it to be.
Well, in my mind, OpenSolaris was on the way to becoming a "download iso", "burn disc", "insert into target machine", "boot to CD-ROM", "install", and "run"... Like, hum... Solaris maybe...
That's what I'm expecting to see when people say: "We've open-sourced Solaris", or "Solaris is Open Source"
So my expectation is: An open-source distro based on Solaris technology with ZFS et al, that will be "the next version" of Solaris that people put on their servers to run their enterprise, home, media center, embedded systems, set-top boxes, cars, bootable usb keys, etc...
I'm fairly sure I'm not the only person with that expectation.
Chris Mahan 818.943.1850 cell chris_mahan at yahoo dot com chris dot mahan at gmail dot com http://www.christophermahan.com/
_____________________________________________________________________________ _______ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
Posts:
3,398
From:
Registered:
3/9/05
|
|
|
|
Re: On Expectations of Open Solaris
Posted:
Feb 2, 2007 9:54 AM
in response to: Christopher Mahan
|
|
>Well, in my mind, OpenSolaris was on the way to becoming a "download >iso", "burn disc", "insert into target machine", "boot to CD-ROM", >"install", and "run"... Like, hum... Solaris maybe...
No, not at all; that was never the intention.
That's what distributions do; they collate bits of software and make it into a distribution. Solaris is an example of such a distribution. Should Sun make a second distribution which does the same thing but contains only the bits already opensource or available in source elsewhere?
No, it would be silly for Sun to maintain two distributions.
Others willmake other OpenSolaris distributions.
>That's what I'm expecting to see when people say: "We've open-sourced >Solaris", or "Solaris is Open Source"
Strange; if I read "they've opensourced product X" then I expect to be able to download the *source*; not the installable product.
>So my expectation is: An open-source distro based on Solaris >technology with ZFS et al, that will be "the next version" of Solaris >that people put on their servers to run their enterprise, home, media >center, embedded systems, set-top boxes, cars, bootable usb keys, >etc... > >I'm fairly sure I'm not the only person with that expectation.
Yeah, but that's what Solaris is and that's what the distros are.
Casper _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
Christopher Mahan
chris_mahan@yahoo.com
|
|
|
|
Re: On Expectations of Open Solaris
Posted:
Feb 2, 2007 10:12 AM
in response to: casper
|
|
--- Casper.***@Sun.COM wrote:
> > >Well, in my mind, OpenSolaris was on the way to becoming a > "download > >iso", "burn disc", "insert into target machine", "boot to CD-ROM", > >"install", and "run"... Like, hum... Solaris maybe... > > No, not at all; that was never the intention.
Ok, glad that's cleared up.
> That's what distributions do; they collate bits of software and > make it into a distribution. Solaris is an example of such > a distribution. Should Sun make a second distribution which > does the same thing but contains only the bits already opensource > or available in source elsewhere? > > No, it would be silly for Sun to maintain two distributions.
Well, silly it might be, but it would sure make things easier for me.
> Others willmake other OpenSolaris distributions.
But my boss will never let me download and install software that comes from some community site on our production systems. I need to be able to point him to a page at SUN and have a binary distro.
> >That's what I'm expecting to see when people say: "We've > open-sourced > >Solaris", or "Solaris is Open Source" > > Strange; if I read "they've opensourced product X" then I expect to > be able to download the *source*; not the installable product.
Oh, I *never* build from source. I have personally never, ever, not even once built from source any stuff I didn't write. If I can't find a binary out there, I won't use it.
This is why I use Debian. I don't have to. I manage with apt-get and have to --purge once in a while because I can't even get that right sometimes.
I am an application developer. I build stuff for people to solve their business problems. I glue stuff together, and I'm always ready to thank the developers of open-source software with a kind word of support, a paypal donation, and extolling of the greatness of the software with the great unwashed masses... But I won't build from source.
> >So my expectation is: An open-source distro based on Solaris > >technology with ZFS et al, that will be "the next version" of > Solaris > >that people put on their servers to run their enterprise, home, > media > >center, embedded systems, set-top boxes, cars, bootable usb keys, > >etc... > > > >I'm fairly sure I'm not the only person with that expectation. > > Yeah, but that's what Solaris is and that's what the distros are.
Ok, but isn't Solaris a distro too?
Let me recap for my benefit:
OpenSolaris is a set of open sourced software packages. One of these is the Kernel. Other of these are tools, like ksh.
Solaris is a distro that includes the kernel and a bunch of tools, as well as other software from other sources such as Apache, PostgreSQL, etc.
Am I closer to the mark?
What do people at Sun call the kernel itself?
As an aside for a non-c-coder type out there: I could really use a diagram of all this.
Thanks.
Chris Mahan 818.943.1850 cell chris_mahan at yahoo dot com chris dot mahan at gmail dot com http://www.christophermahan.com/
_____________________________________________________________________________ _______ Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
Posts:
3,398
From:
Registered:
3/9/05
|
|
|
|
Re: On Expectations of Open Solaris
Posted:
Feb 2, 2007 10:24 AM
in response to: Christopher Mahan
|
|
>> No, it would be silly for Sun to maintain two distributions. > >Well, silly it might be, but it would sure make things easier for me.
So why can't you download Solaris Express Community Edition; that's pretty much the Sun assembled "based on OpenSolaris" distribution.
What would you want differently in a mythical "Sun OpenSolaris distribution"?
>Ok, but isn't Solaris a distro too?
Yes.
>Let me recap for my benefit: > >OpenSolaris is a set of open sourced software packages. One of these >is the Kernel. Other of these are tools, like ksh.
We don't make distinction along those lines: we have the "core OS" (OS + Networking) and then whatever is sitting on that foundation: X, GNOME, etc; an increasing number of components available.
>Solaris is a distro that includes the kernel and a bunch of tools, as >well as other software from other sources such as Apache, PostgreSQL, > etc. > >Am I closer to the mark?
Yes.
>What do people at Sun call the kernel itself?
"SunOS" perhaps (but it's for the larger OS-Net "consolidation")
Casper _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|