|
Replies:
24
-
Last Post:
Feb 6, 2008 9:39 AM
by: dclack
|
|
|
Posts:
124
From:
FR
Registered:
10/4/06
|
|
|
|
ATI Radeon support for compiz easy install bundle
Posted:
Jan 25, 2008 8:19 AM
|
|
Hi All,
I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
check script to support
the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
Details can be found here :
http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
Cheers,
Erwann
--
Erwann Chénedé,
Desktop Group, Sun Microsystems, Grenoble
[ I speak for myself, not for my employer ]
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
Posts:
33
From:
Registered:
11/7/06
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy install
bundle
Posted:
Jan 25, 2008 8:43 AM
in response to: erwannc
|
|
Good work Erwann, Now we just need to wait the new 3D driver of ATI card
to be integrated into Solaris.
Chris
Erwann Chenede 写道:
> Hi All,
> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration check
> script to support
> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
>
> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
>
> Details can be found here :
> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
>
> Cheers,
>
> Erwann
>
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
257
From:
IE
Registered:
7/4/05
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy install
bundle
Posted:
Jan 25, 2008 9:03 AM
in response to: erwannc
|
|
Erwann,
Thanks this is excellent news! Between ATI and Nvidia chipsets, we must
be getting close to majority coverage of the accelerated graphics
hardware on modern PCs. Are there accelerated Solaris drivers for 3d
acceleration on Intel chipsets yet?
Once they are stable, these drivers should improve performance even on
desktop without compiz.
Erwann Chenede wrote:
> Hi All,
> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
> check script to support
> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
>
> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
>
> Details can be found here :
> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
>
> Cheers,
>
> Erwann
>
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Lau
stevel@opensolaris.org
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy install
bundle
Posted:
Jan 25, 2008 9:06 AM
in response to: bnitz
|
|
OpenSolaris has had accelerated 3d for Intel devices for quite a while
already :)
In fact, it's the only open source accelerated 3d device support in
OpenSolaris right now (AFAIK)
cheers,
steve
Brian Nitz wrote:
> Erwann,
>
> Thanks this is excellent news! Between ATI and Nvidia chipsets, we must
> be getting close to majority coverage of the accelerated graphics
> hardware on modern PCs. Are there accelerated Solaris drivers for 3d
> acceleration on Intel chipsets yet?
>
> Once they are stable, these drivers should improve performance even on
> desktop without compiz.
>
> Erwann Chenede wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
>> check script to support
>> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
>>
>> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
>>
>> Details can be found here :
>> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Erwann
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-discuss mailing list
> desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
>
--
stephen lau | stevel at opensolaris dot org | www.whacked.net
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
257
From:
IE
Registered:
7/4/05
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy install
bundle
Posted:
Jan 25, 2008 9:31 AM
in response to: Stephen Lau
|
|
Hmm, I thought Nvidia went in a long time ago. I must have been thinking
Solaris 10? Did NVidia's weird license prevent drivers from being
delivered with Opensolaris? That's good news about ATI and Intel though.
Stephen Lau wrote:
> OpenSolaris has had accelerated 3d for Intel devices for quite a while
> already :)
> In fact, it's the only open source accelerated 3d device support in
> OpenSolaris right now (AFAIK)
>
> cheers,
> steve
>
> Brian Nitz wrote:
>> Erwann,
>>
>> Thanks this is excellent news! Between ATI and Nvidia chipsets, we
>> must be getting close to majority coverage of the accelerated
>> graphics hardware on modern PCs. Are there accelerated Solaris
>> drivers for 3d acceleration on Intel chipsets yet?
>> Once they are stable, these drivers should improve performance even
>> on desktop without compiz.
>>
>> Erwann Chenede wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
>>> check script to support
>>> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
>>>
>>> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
>>>
>>> Details can be found here :
>>> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Erwann
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> desktop-discuss mailing list
>> desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Shawn Walker
swalker@opensolaris....
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy install
bundle
Posted:
Jan 25, 2008 9:35 AM
in response to: bnitz
|
|
On Jan 25, 2008 11:31 AM, Brian Nitz <Brian dot Nitz at sun dot com> wrote:
> Hmm, I thought Nvidia went in a long time ago. I must have been thinking
> Solaris 10? Did NVidia's weird license prevent drivers from being
> delivered with Opensolaris? That's good news about ATI and Intel though.
Lau did say *open source* 3d :)
> Stephen Lau wrote:
> > OpenSolaris has had accelerated 3d for Intel devices for quite a while
> > already :)
> > In fact, it's the only open source accelerated 3d device support in
> > OpenSolaris right now (AFAIK)
> >
> > cheers,
> > steve
> >
> > Brian Nitz wrote:
> >> Erwann,
> >>
> >> Thanks this is excellent news! Between ATI and Nvidia chipsets, we
> >> must be getting close to majority coverage of the accelerated
> >> graphics hardware on modern PCs. Are there accelerated Solaris
> >> drivers for 3d acceleration on Intel chipsets yet?
> >> Once they are stable, these drivers should improve performance even
> >> on desktop without compiz.
> >>
> >> Erwann Chenede wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
> >>> check script to support
> >>> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
> >>>
> >>> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
> >>>
> >>> Details can be found here :
> >>> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Erwann
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> desktop-discuss mailing list
> >> desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
> >>
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-discuss mailing list
> desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
>
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
"To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." -
Robert Orben
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Lau
stevel@opensolaris.org
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy install
bundle
Posted:
Jan 25, 2008 9:44 AM
in response to: bnitz
|
|
Nvidia's drivers aren't open source...
Brian Nitz wrote:
> Hmm, I thought Nvidia went in a long time ago. I must have been
> thinking Solaris 10? Did NVidia's weird license prevent drivers from
> being delivered with Opensolaris? That's good news about ATI and
> Intel though.
> Stephen Lau wrote:
>> OpenSolaris has had accelerated 3d for Intel devices for quite a
>> while already :)
>> In fact, it's the only open source accelerated 3d device support in
>> OpenSolaris right now (AFAIK)
>>
>> cheers,
>> steve
>>
>> Brian Nitz wrote:
>>> Erwann,
>>>
>>> Thanks this is excellent news! Between ATI and Nvidia chipsets, we
>>> must be getting close to majority coverage of the accelerated
>>> graphics hardware on modern PCs. Are there accelerated Solaris
>>> drivers for 3d acceleration on Intel chipsets yet?
>>> Once they are stable, these drivers should improve performance even
>>> on desktop without compiz.
>>>
>>> Erwann Chenede wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my
>>>> configuration check script to support
>>>> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
>>>>
>>>> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
>>>>
>>>> Details can be found here :
>>>> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Erwann
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> desktop-discuss mailing list
>>> desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
>>>
>>
>>
--
stephen lau | stevel at opensolaris dot org | www.whacked.net
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
5,504
From:
US
Registered:
3/9/05
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy install
bundle
Posted:
Jan 25, 2008 10:48 AM
in response to: bnitz
|
|
nvidia's closed source 3D drivers were first delivered in Solaris 10 Update 4
and Solaris Nevada build 58. Prior to that they were available as a web
download. nvidia's open source drivers only support basic 2D display, without
any 3D hardware acceleration, and steve did say "open source accelerated 3d
device support".
The closed drivers are not included in Project Indiana, aka
"OpenSolaris Developer Preview", because the license did not allow
redistribution when that was built. That has since changed, so they
may be included in the upcoming Developer Preview 2. (Whether or not
they're on the LiveCD or just in the repo is TBD, depending on how full
the CD is and resolving the GNOME font size issues.)
-alan-
Brian Nitz wrote:
> Hmm, I thought Nvidia went in a long time ago. I must have been thinking
> Solaris 10? Did NVidia's weird license prevent drivers from being
> delivered with Opensolaris? That's good news about ATI and Intel though.
>
> Stephen Lau wrote:
>> OpenSolaris has had accelerated 3d for Intel devices for quite a while
>> already :)
>> In fact, it's the only open source accelerated 3d device support in
>> OpenSolaris right now (AFAIK)
>>
>> cheers,
>> steve
>>
>> Brian Nitz wrote:
>>> Erwann,
>>>
>>> Thanks this is excellent news! Between ATI and Nvidia chipsets, we
>>> must be getting close to majority coverage of the accelerated
>>> graphics hardware on modern PCs. Are there accelerated Solaris
>>> drivers for 3d acceleration on Intel chipsets yet?
>>> Once they are stable, these drivers should improve performance even
>>> on desktop without compiz.
>>>
>>> Erwann Chenede wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
>>>> check script to support
>>>> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
>>>>
>>>> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
>>>>
>>>> Details can be found here :
>>>> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Erwann
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> desktop-discuss mailing list
>>> desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-discuss mailing list
> desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan dot coopersmith at sun dot com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
5,504
From:
US
Registered:
3/9/05
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy install
bundle
Posted:
Jan 25, 2008 10:44 AM
in response to: bnitz
|
|
We had Intel before ATI, and have far more Intel chipsets covered than ATI
ones - the ATI DRI drivers only cover ATI cards that haven't been sold in
a few years (R400 and earlier - up to the Radeon X850 approximately in
model numbers) - the community is still waiting for AMD to follow the 2D
specs release for the current card generations (R500 & R600, aka Radeon
X1000-series & HD2000-series) with the promised release of 3D specs.
-Alan Coopersmith- alan dot coopersmith at sun dot com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
Brian Nitz wrote:
> Erwann,
>
> Thanks this is excellent news! Between ATI and Nvidia chipsets, we must
> be getting close to majority coverage of the accelerated graphics
> hardware on modern PCs. Are there accelerated Solaris drivers for 3d
> acceleration on Intel chipsets yet?
>
> Once they are stable, these drivers should improve performance even on
> desktop without compiz.
>
> Erwann Chenede wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
>> check script to support
>> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
>>
>> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
>>
>> Details can be found here :
>> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Erwann
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-discuss mailing list
> desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
34
From:
UK
Registered:
6/14/05
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy install
bundle
Posted:
Jan 25, 2008 12:06 PM
in response to: erwannc
|
|
Hi,
I've been having fun trying to get this working on my Ferrari 3400.
Anyone else had any luck?
Firstly, the driver installer needs to be run without Xorg running. And
the 3400 can't work in text console mode, so I had to ssh in from an
iMac. That worked ok - "svcadm disable gdm"; "install.sh install";
"svcadm enable gdm".
I then install compiz. The wget script to check if it would run said
no, because at that stage I'd not edited my xorg.conf, so the radeon
driver wasn't in. But the compiz installer does that.
My next problem was that I was using Darren's multi headed xorg.conf,
and DRI isn't compatible with multiple heads yet. So I tried out the
SingleLayout and the CloneLayout, and neither worked much better. Mind
you, the:
Option "AIGLX" "True"
is only added to the currently active layout by the installers, so that
needed adding.
My main problem seems to be that neither drm nor radeon are being
modloaded by the kernel. I can "modload -p misc/drm" OK, but "modload
-p drv/radeon" fails with "can't load module: No such device or
address". Which is odd, because it shows in prtconf -v as:
value='pci1002,4e50.1025.57.0' +
'pci1002,4e50.1025.57' + 'pci1025,57' + 'pci1002,4e50.0' +
'pci1002,4e50' + 'pciclass,030000' + 'pciclass,0300'
and:
9 ]grep 4e50 driver*
driver_aliases:radeon "pci1002,4e50"
So it should work, no? I've done a "reboot -- -r" and that didn't help.
Xorg finds my card and it's supported by *its* radeon driver. Until
(from /var/log/Xorg.0.log):
:
(--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon Mobility 9600/9700 (M10/M11) NP
(AGP)" (ChipID = 0x4e50)
(--) RADEON(0): Linear framebuffer at 0xd8000000
(II) RADEON(0): AGP card detected
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
[drm] failed to load kernel module "radeon"
(EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed to open the DRM
[dri] Disabling DRI.
:
/dev/dri exists since I modloaded the drm module, but didn't before.
And it's empty =O(
Anyone got any further ideas?
Ta,
Mark.
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:19 +0100, Erwann Chenede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
> check script to support
> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
>
> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
>
> Details can be found here :
> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
>
> Cheers,
>
> Erwann
>
--
| o o Software Support Engineering,
/v\ark R. Bowyer. SPARC House, Guillemont Park,
`-' Minley Rd, Blackwater,
Tel: +44 (0)1252 420691 Camberley, SURREY, GU17 9QG
Fax: +44 (0)1252 421658 United Kingdom __|
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Angelo Rajadurai
Angelo.Rajadurai@Sun...
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy
install bundle
Posted:
Jan 25, 2008 12:14 PM
in response to: moredhel
|
|
Hey Mark:
I got it to work on my 3400. I'm on snv_78. Pretty straight forward.
I downloaded the radeon 3D driver from http://opensolaris.org/os/project/dri/files/
I had to copy the /etc/X11/.xorg.conf to /etc/X11/xorg.conf and then add
Option "BusType" "PCI"
Then I rebooted and installed compiz with the --with-experimental-ati-
support
option. It feels pretty zappy even with the 1GB mem I have on the
system.
Let me know if need more info
-Angelo
On Jan 25, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been having fun trying to get this working on my Ferrari 3400.
> Anyone else had any luck?
>
> Firstly, the driver installer needs to be run without Xorg running.
> And
> the 3400 can't work in text console mode, so I had to ssh in from an
> iMac. That worked ok - "svcadm disable gdm"; "install.sh install";
> "svcadm enable gdm".
>
> I then install compiz. The wget script to check if it would run said
> no, because at that stage I'd not edited my xorg.conf, so the radeon
> driver wasn't in. But the compiz installer does that.
>
> My next problem was that I was using Darren's multi headed xorg.conf,
> and DRI isn't compatible with multiple heads yet. So I tried out the
> SingleLayout and the CloneLayout, and neither worked much better.
> Mind
> you, the:
>
> Option "AIGLX" "True"
>
> is only added to the currently active layout by the installers, so
> that
> needed adding.
>
> My main problem seems to be that neither drm nor radeon are being
> modloaded by the kernel. I can "modload -p misc/drm" OK, but "modload
> -p drv/radeon" fails with "can't load module: No such device or
> address". Which is odd, because it shows in prtconf -v as:
>
> value='pci1002,4e50.1025.57.0' +
> 'pci1002,4e50.1025.57' + 'pci1025,57' + 'pci1002,4e50.0' +
> 'pci1002,4e50' + 'pciclass,030000' + 'pciclass,0300'
>
> and:
>
> 9 ]grep 4e50 driver*
> driver_aliases:radeon "pci1002,4e50"
>
> So it should work, no? I've done a "reboot -- -r" and that didn't
> help.
> Xorg finds my card and it's supported by *its* radeon driver. Until
> (from /var/log/Xorg.0.log):
>
> :
> (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon Mobility 9600/9700 (M10/M11) NP
> (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x4e50)
> (--) RADEON(0): Linear framebuffer at 0xd8000000
> (II) RADEON(0): AGP card detected
> drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
> drmOpenDevice: Open failed
> [drm] failed to load kernel module "radeon"
> (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed to open the DRM
> [dri] Disabling DRI.
> :
>
> /dev/dri exists since I modloaded the drm module, but didn't before.
> And it's empty =O(
>
> Anyone got any further ideas?
>
> Ta,
> Mark.
>
>
> On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:19 +0100, Erwann Chenede wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
>> check script to support
>> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
>>
>> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
>>
>> Details can be found here :
>> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Erwann
>>
> --
> | o o Software Support
> Engineering,
> /v\ark R. Bowyer. SPARC House, Guillemont Park,
> `-' Minley Rd, Blackwater,
> Tel: +44 (0)1252 420691 Camberley, SURREY, GU17 9QG
> Fax: +44 (0)1252 421658 United Kingdom __|
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-discuss mailing list
> desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
34
From:
UK
Registered:
6/14/05
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz
easy install bundle
Posted:
Jan 25, 2008 12:26 PM
in response to: Angelo Rajadurai
|
|
Hi Angelo =O)
Thanks for answering. I didn't have an .xorg.conf - that's usually a
left over from some other time - could you post me your working file,
please?
Could you also send me the output of the following on your working
system, please?
o ls -l /dev/dri
o modinfo | grep radeon
And you /var/log/Xorg.0.log would be useful, too. Just to see if I can
spot the difference. I figure I've over configured myself into a corner
here with other changes =O}
Thanks,
Mark
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 15:14 -0500, Angelo Rajadurai wrote:
> Hey Mark:
>
> I got it to work on my 3400. I'm on snv_78. Pretty straight forward.
> I downloaded the radeon 3D driver from http://opensolaris.org/os/project/dri/files/
>
> I had to copy the /etc/X11/.xorg.conf to /etc/X11/xorg.conf and then add
> Option "BusType" "PCI"
>
> Then I rebooted and installed compiz with the --with-experimental-ati-
> support
> option. It feels pretty zappy even with the 1GB mem I have on the
> system.
>
> Let me know if need more info
>
> -Angelo
>
>
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been having fun trying to get this working on my Ferrari 3400.
> > Anyone else had any luck?
> >
> > Firstly, the driver installer needs to be run without Xorg running.
> > And
> > the 3400 can't work in text console mode, so I had to ssh in from an
> > iMac. That worked ok - "svcadm disable gdm"; "install.sh install";
> > "svcadm enable gdm".
> >
> > I then install compiz. The wget script to check if it would run said
> > no, because at that stage I'd not edited my xorg.conf, so the radeon
> > driver wasn't in. But the compiz installer does that.
> >
> > My next problem was that I was using Darren's multi headed xorg.conf,
> > and DRI isn't compatible with multiple heads yet. So I tried out the
> > SingleLayout and the CloneLayout, and neither worked much better.
> > Mind
> > you, the:
> >
> > Option "AIGLX" "True"
> >
> > is only added to the currently active layout by the installers, so
> > that
> > needed adding.
> >
> > My main problem seems to be that neither drm nor radeon are being
> > modloaded by the kernel. I can "modload -p misc/drm" OK, but "modload
> > -p drv/radeon" fails with "can't load module: No such device or
> > address". Which is odd, because it shows in prtconf -v as:
> >
> > value='pci1002,4e50.1025.57.0' +
> > 'pci1002,4e50.1025.57' + 'pci1025,57' + 'pci1002,4e50.0' +
> > 'pci1002,4e50' + 'pciclass,030000' + 'pciclass,0300'
> >
> > and:
> >
> > 9 ]grep 4e50 driver*
> > driver_aliases:radeon "pci1002,4e50"
> >
> > So it should work, no? I've done a "reboot -- -r" and that didn't
> > help.
> > Xorg finds my card and it's supported by *its* radeon driver. Until
> > (from /var/log/Xorg.0.log):
> >
> > :
> > (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon Mobility 9600/9700 (M10/M11) NP
> > (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x4e50)
> > (--) RADEON(0): Linear framebuffer at 0xd8000000
> > (II) RADEON(0): AGP card detected
> > drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
> > drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
> > drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
> > drmOpenDevice: Open failed
> > [drm] failed to load kernel module "radeon"
> > (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed to open the DRM
> > [dri] Disabling DRI.
> > :
> >
> > /dev/dri exists since I modloaded the drm module, but didn't before.
> > And it's empty =O(
> >
> > Anyone got any further ideas?
> >
> > Ta,
> > Mark.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:19 +0100, Erwann Chenede wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
> >> check script to support
> >> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
> >>
> >> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
> >>
> >> Details can be found here :
> >> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Erwann
> >>
> > --
> > | o o Software Support
> > Engineering,
> > /v\ark R. Bowyer. SPARC House, Guillemont Park,
> > `-' Minley Rd, Blackwater,
> > Tel: +44 (0)1252 420691 Camberley, SURREY, GU17 9QG
> > Fax: +44 (0)1252 421658 United Kingdom __|
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > desktop-discuss mailing list
> > desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
>
--
| o o Software Support Engineering,
/v\ark R. Bowyer. SPARC House, Guillemont Park,
`-' Minley Rd, Blackwater,
Tel: +44 (0)1252 420691 Camberley, SURREY, GU17 9QG
Fax: +44 (0)1252 421658 United Kingdom __|
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
34
From:
UK
Registered:
6/14/05
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy
install bundle
Posted:
Jan 25, 2008 2:16 PM
in response to: moredhel
|
|
Hi again,
I'm using Angelo's xorg.conf, but it's not working still. He's showing:
bash-3.2# ls -l /dev/dri
total 2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 51 Jan 25 11:50 card0
-> ../../devices/pci@0,0/pc
i1106,b188@1/display@0:drm0
bash-3.2# modinfo | grep radeon
83 fffffffff7aac000 250f8 264 1 radeon (radeon DRM driver 1.3)
and I've got:
6 ]ll /devices/pci@0,0/pci1106,b188@1/
total 3
drwxr-xr-x 3 root sys 512 Jan 25 2005 .
drwxr-xr-x 17 root sys 512 May 30 2007 ..
drwxr-xr-x 2 root sys 512 Jan 25 2005 display@0
crw------- 1 root sys 99, 1 Jan 25 22:00
display@0:agpmaster0
crw------- 1 markbo other 99, 0 Jan 25 2005 display@0:text-0
and
3 ]modload -p drv/radeon
can't load module: No such device or address
so it's something before X even starts?
Thanks Angelo, but I have something else wrong. I'm running snv_75 and
frkit.
Anyone got any suggestions? It's gone 10pm here now, so I'm stopping
for the week. And I'll try upgrading the OS if nothing else comes to
me...
Ta,
Mark.
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 20:26 +0000, Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
> Hi Angelo =O)
>
> Thanks for answering. I didn't have an .xorg.conf - that's usually a
> left over from some other time - could you post me your working file,
> please?
>
> Could you also send me the output of the following on your working
> system, please?
>
> o ls -l /dev/dri
> o modinfo | grep radeon
>
> And you /var/log/Xorg.0.log would be useful, too. Just to see if I can
> spot the difference. I figure I've over configured myself into a corner
> here with other changes =O}
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
>
> On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 15:14 -0500, Angelo Rajadurai wrote:
> > Hey Mark:
> >
> > I got it to work on my 3400. I'm on snv_78. Pretty straight forward.
> > I downloaded the radeon 3D driver from http://opensolaris.org/os/project/dri/files/
> >
> > I had to copy the /etc/X11/.xorg.conf to /etc/X11/xorg.conf and then add
> > Option "BusType" "PCI"
> >
> > Then I rebooted and installed compiz with the --with-experimental-ati-
> > support
> > option. It feels pretty zappy even with the 1GB mem I have on the
> > system.
> >
> > Let me know if need more info
> >
> > -Angelo
> >
> >
> > On Jan 25, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've been having fun trying to get this working on my Ferrari 3400.
> > > Anyone else had any luck?
> > >
> > > Firstly, the driver installer needs to be run without Xorg running.
> > > And
> > > the 3400 can't work in text console mode, so I had to ssh in from an
> > > iMac. That worked ok - "svcadm disable gdm"; "install.sh install";
> > > "svcadm enable gdm".
> > >
> > > I then install compiz. The wget script to check if it would run said
> > > no, because at that stage I'd not edited my xorg.conf, so the radeon
> > > driver wasn't in. But the compiz installer does that.
> > >
> > > My next problem was that I was using Darren's multi headed xorg.conf,
> > > and DRI isn't compatible with multiple heads yet. So I tried out the
> > > SingleLayout and the CloneLayout, and neither worked much better.
> > > Mind
> > > you, the:
> > >
> > > Option "AIGLX" "True"
> > >
> > > is only added to the currently active layout by the installers, so
> > > that
> > > needed adding.
> > >
> > > My main problem seems to be that neither drm nor radeon are being
> > > modloaded by the kernel. I can "modload -p misc/drm" OK, but "modload
> > > -p drv/radeon" fails with "can't load module: No such device or
> > > address". Which is odd, because it shows in prtconf -v as:
> > >
> > > value='pci1002,4e50.1025.57.0' +
> > > 'pci1002,4e50.1025.57' + 'pci1025,57' + 'pci1002,4e50.0' +
> > > 'pci1002,4e50' + 'pciclass,030000' + 'pciclass,0300'
> > >
> > > and:
> > >
> > > 9 ]grep 4e50 driver*
> > > driver_aliases:radeon "pci1002,4e50"
> > >
> > > So it should work, no? I've done a "reboot -- -r" and that didn't
> > > help.
> > > Xorg finds my card and it's supported by *its* radeon driver. Until
> > > (from /var/log/Xorg.0.log):
> > >
> > > :
> > > (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon Mobility 9600/9700 (M10/M11) NP
> > > (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x4e50)
> > > (--) RADEON(0): Linear framebuffer at 0xd8000000
> > > (II) RADEON(0): AGP card detected
> > > drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
> > > drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
> > > drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
> > > drmOpenDevice: Open failed
> > > [drm] failed to load kernel module "radeon"
> > > (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed to open the DRM
> > > [dri] Disabling DRI.
> > > :
> > >
> > > /dev/dri exists since I modloaded the drm module, but didn't before.
> > > And it's empty =O(
> > >
> > > Anyone got any further ideas?
> > >
> > > Ta,
> > > Mark.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:19 +0100, Erwann Chenede wrote:
> > >> Hi All,
> > >>
> > >> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
> > >> check script to support
> > >> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
> > >>
> > >> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
> > >>
> > >> Details can be found here :
> > >> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >>
> > >> Erwann
> > >>
> > > --
> > > | o o Software Support
> > > Engineering,
> > > /v\ark R. Bowyer. SPARC House, Guillemont Park,
> > > `-' Minley Rd, Blackwater,
> > > Tel: +44 (0)1252 420691 Camberley, SURREY, GU17 9QG
> > > Fax: +44 (0)1252 421658 United Kingdom __|
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > desktop-discuss mailing list
> > > desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
> >
--
| o o Software Support Engineering,
/v\ark R. Bowyer. SPARC House, Guillemont Park,
`-' Minley Rd, Blackwater,
Tel: +44 (0)1252 420691 Camberley, SURREY, GU17 9QG
Fax: +44 (0)1252 421658 United Kingdom __|
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
33
From:
Registered:
11/7/06
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy install
bundle
Posted:
Jan 25, 2008 4:43 PM
in response to: moredhel
|
|
CCed to ATI 3D driver developer, he may give u the answer
Chris
Mark R. Bowyer 写道:
> Hi again,
>
> I'm using Angelo's xorg.conf, but it's not working still. He's showing:
>
> bash-3.2# ls -l /dev/dri
> total 2
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 51 Jan 25 11:50 card0
> -> ../../devices/pci@0,0/pc
> i1106,b188@1/display@0:drm0
> bash-3.2# modinfo | grep radeon
> 83 fffffffff7aac000 250f8 264 1 radeon (radeon DRM driver 1.3)
>
> and I've got:
>
> 6 ]ll /devices/pci@0,0/pci1106,b188@1/
> total 3
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root sys 512 Jan 25 2005 .
> drwxr-xr-x 17 root sys 512 May 30 2007 ..
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root sys 512 Jan 25 2005 display@0
> crw------- 1 root sys 99, 1 Jan 25 22:00
> display@0:agpmaster0
> crw------- 1 markbo other 99, 0 Jan 25 2005 display@0:text-0
> and
> 3 ]modload -p drv/radeon
> can't load module: No such device or address
>
> so it's something before X even starts?
>
> Thanks Angelo, but I have something else wrong. I'm running snv_75 and
> frkit.
>
> Anyone got any suggestions? It's gone 10pm here now, so I'm stopping
> for the week. And I'll try upgrading the OS if nothing else comes to
> me...
>
> Ta,
> Mark.
>
> On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 20:26 +0000, Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
>
>> Hi Angelo =O)
>>
>> Thanks for answering. I didn't have an .xorg.conf - that's usually a
>> left over from some other time - could you post me your working file,
>> please?
>>
>> Could you also send me the output of the following on your working
>> system, please?
>>
>> o ls -l /dev/dri
>> o modinfo | grep radeon
>>
>> And you /var/log/Xorg.0.log would be useful, too. Just to see if I can
>> spot the difference. I figure I've over configured myself into a corner
>> here with other changes =O}
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 15:14 -0500, Angelo Rajadurai wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Mark:
>>>
>>> I got it to work on my 3400. I'm on snv_78. Pretty straight forward.
>>> I downloaded the radeon 3D driver from http://opensolaris.org/os/project/dri/files/
>>>
>>> I had to copy the /etc/X11/.xorg.conf to /etc/X11/xorg.conf and then add
>>> Option "BusType" "PCI"
>>>
>>> Then I rebooted and installed compiz with the --with-experimental-ati-
>>> support
>>> option. It feels pretty zappy even with the 1GB mem I have on the
>>> system.
>>>
>>> Let me know if need more info
>>>
>>> -Angelo
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 25, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I've been having fun trying to get this working on my Ferrari 3400.
>>>> Anyone else had any luck?
>>>>
>>>> Firstly, the driver installer needs to be run without Xorg running.
>>>> And
>>>> the 3400 can't work in text console mode, so I had to ssh in from an
>>>> iMac. That worked ok - "svcadm disable gdm"; "install.sh install";
>>>> "svcadm enable gdm".
>>>>
>>>> I then install compiz. The wget script to check if it would run said
>>>> no, because at that stage I'd not edited my xorg.conf, so the radeon
>>>> driver wasn't in. But the compiz installer does that.
>>>>
>>>> My next problem was that I was using Darren's multi headed xorg.conf,
>>>> and DRI isn't compatible with multiple heads yet. So I tried out the
>>>> SingleLayout and the CloneLayout, and neither worked much better.
>>>> Mind
>>>> you, the:
>>>>
>>>> Option "AIGLX" "True"
>>>>
>>>> is only added to the currently active layout by the installers, so
>>>> that
>>>> needed adding.
>>>>
>>>> My main problem seems to be that neither drm nor radeon are being
>>>> modloaded by the kernel. I can "modload -p misc/drm" OK, but "modload
>>>> -p drv/radeon" fails with "can't load module: No such device or
>>>> address". Which is odd, because it shows in prtconf -v as:
>>>>
>>>> value='pci1002,4e50.1025.57.0' +
>>>> 'pci1002,4e50.1025.57' + 'pci1025,57' + 'pci1002,4e50.0' +
>>>> 'pci1002,4e50' + 'pciclass,030000' + 'pciclass,0300'
>>>>
>>>> and:
>>>>
>>>> 9 ]grep 4e50 driver*
>>>> driver_aliases:radeon "pci1002,4e50"
>>>>
>>>> So it should work, no? I've done a "reboot -- -r" and that didn't
>>>> help.
>>>> Xorg finds my card and it's supported by *its* radeon driver. Until
>>>> (from /var/log/Xorg.0.log):
>>>>
>>>> :
>>>> (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon Mobility 9600/9700 (M10/M11) NP
>>>> (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x4e50)
>>>> (--) RADEON(0): Linear framebuffer at 0xd8000000
>>>> (II) RADEON(0): AGP card detected
>>>> drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
>>>> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
>>>> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
>>>> drmOpenDevice: Open failed
>>>> [drm] failed to load kernel module "radeon"
>>>> (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed to open the DRM
>>>> [dri] Disabling DRI.
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>> /dev/dri exists since I modloaded the drm module, but didn't before.
>>>> And it's empty =O(
>>>>
>>>> Anyone got any further ideas?
>>>>
>>>> Ta,
>>>> Mark.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:19 +0100, Erwann Chenede wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
>>>>> check script to support
>>>>> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
>>>>>
>>>>> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
>>>>>
>>>>> Details can be found here :
>>>>> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Erwann
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> | o o Software Support
>>>> Engineering,
>>>> /v\ark R. Bowyer. SPARC House, Guillemont Park,
>>>> `-' Minley Rd, Blackwater,
>>>> Tel: +44 (0)1252 420691 Camberley, SURREY, GU17 9QG
>>>> Fax: +44 (0)1252 421658 United Kingdom __|
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> desktop-discuss mailing list
>>>> desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
>>>>
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
84
From:
beijing
Registered:
6/9/06
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy install
bundle
Posted:
Jan 28, 2008 12:49 AM
in response to: moredhel
|
|
Hi, Mark,
I just installed a snv_75 from scratch, and add
Option "BusType" "PCI"
to ATI device section of xorg.conf. And then, I installed compzi via
Erwann's
compiz bundle. It works.
If you cannot set up compiz on F3400, can you send me xorg.conf,
/var/log/Xorg.0.log, /var/dt/Xerror if exists.
-minskey
Mark R. Bowyer 写道:
> Hi Angelo =O)
>
> Thanks for answering. I didn't have an .xorg.conf - that's usually a
> left over from some other time - could you post me your working file,
> please?
>
> Could you also send me the output of the following on your working
> system, please?
>
> o ls -l /dev/dri
> o modinfo | grep radeon
>
> And you /var/log/Xorg.0.log would be useful, too. Just to see if I can
> spot the difference. I figure I've over configured myself into a corner
> here with other changes =O}
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
>
> On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 15:14 -0500, Angelo Rajadurai wrote:
>
>> Hey Mark:
>>
>> I got it to work on my 3400. I'm on snv_78. Pretty straight forward.
>> I downloaded the radeon 3D driver from http://opensolaris.org/os/project/dri/files/
>>
>> I had to copy the /etc/X11/.xorg.conf to /etc/X11/xorg.conf and then add
>> Option "BusType" "PCI"
>>
>> Then I rebooted and installed compiz with the --with-experimental-ati-
>> support
>> option. It feels pretty zappy even with the 1GB mem I have on the
>> system.
>>
>> Let me know if need more info
>>
>> -Angelo
>>
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been having fun trying to get this working on my Ferrari 3400.
>>> Anyone else had any luck?
>>>
>>> Firstly, the driver installer needs to be run without Xorg running.
>>> And
>>> the 3400 can't work in text console mode, so I had to ssh in from an
>>> iMac. That worked ok - "svcadm disable gdm"; "install.sh install";
>>> "svcadm enable gdm".
>>>
>>> I then install compiz. The wget script to check if it would run said
>>> no, because at that stage I'd not edited my xorg.conf, so the radeon
>>> driver wasn't in. But the compiz installer does that.
>>>
>>> My next problem was that I was using Darren's multi headed xorg.conf,
>>> and DRI isn't compatible with multiple heads yet. So I tried out the
>>> SingleLayout and the CloneLayout, and neither worked much better.
>>> Mind
>>> you, the:
>>>
>>> Option "AIGLX" "True"
>>>
>>> is only added to the currently active layout by the installers, so
>>> that
>>> needed adding.
>>>
>>> My main problem seems to be that neither drm nor radeon are being
>>> modloaded by the kernel. I can "modload -p misc/drm" OK, but "modload
>>> -p drv/radeon" fails with "can't load module: No such device or
>>> address". Which is odd, because it shows in prtconf -v as:
>>>
>>> value='pci1002,4e50.1025.57.0' +
>>> 'pci1002,4e50.1025.57' + 'pci1025,57' + 'pci1002,4e50.0' +
>>> 'pci1002,4e50' + 'pciclass,030000' + 'pciclass,0300'
>>>
>>> and:
>>>
>>> 9 ]grep 4e50 driver*
>>> driver_aliases:radeon "pci1002,4e50"
>>>
>>> So it should work, no? I've done a "reboot -- -r" and that didn't
>>> help.
>>> Xorg finds my card and it's supported by *its* radeon driver. Until
>>> (from /var/log/Xorg.0.log):
>>>
>>> :
>>> (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon Mobility 9600/9700 (M10/M11) NP
>>> (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x4e50)
>>> (--) RADEON(0): Linear framebuffer at 0xd8000000
>>> (II) RADEON(0): AGP card detected
>>> drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
>>> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
>>> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
>>> drmOpenDevice: Open failed
>>> [drm] failed to load kernel module "radeon"
>>> (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed to open the DRM
>>> [dri] Disabling DRI.
>>> :
>>>
>>> /dev/dri exists since I modloaded the drm module, but didn't before.
>>> And it's empty =O(
>>>
>>> Anyone got any further ideas?
>>>
>>> Ta,
>>> Mark.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:19 +0100, Erwann Chenede wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
>>>> check script to support
>>>> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
>>>>
>>>> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
>>>>
>>>> Details can be found here :
>>>> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Erwann
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> | o o Software Support
>>> Engineering,
>>> /v\ark R. Bowyer. SPARC House, Guillemont Park,
>>> `-' Minley Rd, Blackwater,
>>> Tel: +44 (0)1252 420691 Camberley, SURREY, GU17 9QG
>>> Fax: +44 (0)1252 421658 United Kingdom __|
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> desktop-discuss mailing list
>>> desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
>>>
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
34
From:
UK
Registered:
6/14/05
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for
compiz easy install bundle
Posted:
Jan 28, 2008 2:03 AM
in response to: minskey
|
|
|
|
Hi Minskey and Erwann, thank you both for looking into this.
I'm guessing my OS install is too old, and will upgrade to snv_81 when
I'm next in the office (Friday I think).
But in case it helps, a relevant section of my /var/dt/Xerrors file
goes:
X Window System Version 1.3.0
Release Date: 19 April 2007
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 1.3
Build Operating System: SunOS 5.11 snv_72 i86pc
Current Operating System: SunOS marksferrari 5.11 snv_75 i86pc
Build Date: 26 September 2007
Solaris ABI: 64-bit
SUNWxorg-server package version: 6.9.0.5.11.7500,REV=0.2007.09.26
SUNWxorg-graphics-ddx package version: 6.9.0.5.11.7500,REV=0.2007.09.26
SUNWxorg-mesa package version: 6.9.0.5.11.7500,REV=0.2007.09.26
Before reporting problems, check http://sunsolve.sun.com/
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Fri Jan 25 17:27:04 2008
(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf"
(EE) LoadModule: Module bitstream does not have a bitstreamModuleData
data object.
(EE) Failed to load module "bitstream" (invalid module, 0)
dlopen: ld.so.1: Xorg: fatal: relocation error:
file /usr/X11/lib/modules/fonts/amd64//libtype1.so: symbol
Type1RegisterFontFileFunctions: referenced symbol not found
(EE) Failed to load /usr/X11/lib/modules/fonts/amd64//libtype1.so
(EE) Failed to load module "type1" (loader failed, 7)
(II) Module "ddc" already built-in
(II) Module "i2c" already built-in
(II) Module "ddc" already built-in
(II) Module "ramdac" already built-in
(II) Module "ddc" already built-in
(II) Module "i2c" already built-in
(II) Module "ramdac" already built-in
(EE) AIGLX: DRI module not loaded
(EE) AIGLX: DRI module not loaded
X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown).
FreeFontPath: FPE "/usr/X11/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" refcount is 2, should
be 1; fixing.
and the following files are attached:
Xorg.0.log latest log output (using Angelo's xorg.conf)
xorg.conf.orig My original one, Darren's fix for 3400 projector use
xorg.conf.angelo What I'm using now, works for Angelo on b78
".compiz.bad Where I got to converting my old one to work.
I hope you find this useful, and thanks again for helping out.
Ta,
Mark.
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 16:49 +0800, minskey guo wrote:
> Hi, Mark,
>
> I just installed a snv_75 from scratch, and add
>
> Option "BusType" "PCI"
>
> to ATI device section of xorg.conf. And then, I installed compzi via
> Erwann's
> compiz bundle. It works.
>
>
> If you cannot set up compiz on F3400, can you send me xorg.conf,
> /var/log/Xorg.0.log, /var/dt/Xerror if exists.
>
>
> -minskey
>
>
> Mark R. Bowyer 写道:
> > Hi Angelo =O)
> >
> > Thanks for answering. I didn't have an .xorg.conf - that's usually a
> > left over from some other time - could you post me your working file,
> > please?
> >
> > Could you also send me the output of the following on your working
> > system, please?
> >
> > o ls -l /dev/dri
> > o modinfo | grep radeon
> >
> > And you /var/log/Xorg.0.log would be useful, too. Just to see if I can
> > spot the difference. I figure I've over configured myself into a corner
> > here with other changes =O}
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 15:14 -0500, Angelo Rajadurai wrote:
> >
> >> Hey Mark:
> >>
> >> I got it to work on my 3400. I'm on snv_78. Pretty straight forward.
> >> I downloaded the radeon 3D driver from http://opensolaris.org/os/project/dri/files/
> >>
> >> I had to copy the /etc/X11/.xorg.conf to /etc/X11/xorg.conf and then add
> >> Option "BusType" "PCI"
> >>
> >> Then I rebooted and installed compiz with the --with-experimental-ati-
> >> support
> >> option. It feels pretty zappy even with the 1GB mem I have on the
> >> system.
> >>
> >> Let me know if need more info
> >>
> >> -Angelo
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jan 25, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I've been having fun trying to get this working on my Ferrari 3400.
> >>> Anyone else had any luck?
> >>>
> >>> Firstly, the driver installer needs to be run without Xorg running.
> >>> And
> >>> the 3400 can't work in text console mode, so I had to ssh in from an
> >>> iMac. That worked ok - "svcadm disable gdm"; "install.sh install";
> >>> "svcadm enable gdm".
> >>>
> >>> I then install compiz. The wget script to check if it would run said
> >>> no, because at that stage I'd not edited my xorg.conf, so the radeon
> >>> driver wasn't in. But the compiz installer does that.
> >>>
> >>> My next problem was that I was using Darren's multi headed xorg.conf,
> >>> and DRI isn't compatible with multiple heads yet. So I tried out the
> >>> SingleLayout and the CloneLayout, and neither worked much better.
> >>> Mind
> >>> you, the:
> >>>
> >>> Option "AIGLX" "True"
> >>>
> >>> is only added to the currently active layout by the installers, so
> >>> that
> >>> needed adding.
> >>>
> >>> My main problem seems to be that neither drm nor radeon are being
> >>> modloaded by the kernel. I can "modload -p misc/drm" OK, but "modload
> >>> -p drv/radeon" fails with "can't load module: No such device or
> >>> address". Which is odd, because it shows in prtconf -v as:
> >>>
> >>> value='pci1002,4e50.1025.57.0' +
> >>> 'pci1002,4e50.1025.57' + 'pci1025,57' + 'pci1002,4e50.0' +
> >>> 'pci1002,4e50' + 'pciclass,030000' + 'pciclass,0300'
> >>>
> >>> and:
> >>>
> >>> 9 ]grep 4e50 driver*
> >>> driver_aliases:radeon "pci1002,4e50"
> >>>
> >>> So it should work, no? I've done a "reboot -- -r" and that didn't
> >>> help.
> >>> Xorg finds my card and it's supported by *its* radeon driver. Until
> >>> (from /var/log/Xorg.0.log):
> >>>
> >>> :
> >>> (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon Mobility 9600/9700 (M10/M11) NP
> >>> (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x4e50)
> >>> (--) RADEON(0): Linear framebuffer at 0xd8000000
> >>> (II) RADEON(0): AGP card detected
> >>> drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
> >>> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
> >>> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
> >>> drmOpenDevice: Open failed
> >>> [drm] failed to load kernel module "radeon"
> >>> (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed to open the DRM
> >>> [dri] Disabling DRI.
> >>> :
> >>>
> >>> /dev/dri exists since I modloaded the drm module, but didn't before.
> >>> And it's empty =O(
> >>>
> >>> Anyone got any further ideas?
> >>>
> >>> Ta,
> >>> Mark.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:19 +0100, Erwann Chenede wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi All,
> >>>>
> >>>> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
> >>>> check script to support
> >>>> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
> >>>>
> >>>> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
> >>>>
> >>>> Details can be found here :
> >>>> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>> Erwann
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> --
> >>> | o o Software Support
> >>> Engineering,
> >>> /v\ark R. Bowyer. SPARC House, Guillemont Park,
> >>> `-' Minley Rd, Blackwater,
> >>> Tel: +44 (0)1252 420691 Camberley, SURREY, GU17 9QG
> >>> Fax: +44 (0)1252 421658 United Kingdom __|
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> desktop-discuss mailing list
> >>> desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
> >>>
>
--
| o o Software Support Engineering,
/v\ark R. Bowyer. SPARC House, Guillemont Park,
`-' Minley Rd, Blackwater,
Tel: +44 (0)1252 420691 Camberley, SURREY, GU17 9QG
Fax: +44 (0)1252 421658 United Kingdom __|
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
84
From:
beijing
Registered:
6/9/06
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for
compiz easy install bundle
Posted:
Jan 28, 2008 2:48 AM
in response to: moredhel
|
|
Hi, Mark,
From the outputs, the drm/radeon are not attached. Can you send me /etc/driver_aliases, and modinfo/prtconf -D outputs.
-minskey
在 2008-1-28，下午6:03， Mark R. Bowyer 写道： Hi Minskey and Erwann, thank you both for looking into this.
I'm guessing my OS install is too old, and will upgrade to snv_81 when
I'm next in the office (Friday I think).
But in case it helps, a relevant section of my /var/dt/Xerrors file
goes:
X Window System Version 1.3.0
Release Date: 19 April 2007
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 1.3
Build Operating System: SunOS 5.11 snv_72 i86pc
Current Operating System: SunOS marksferrari 5.11 snv_75 i86pc
Build Date: 26 September 2007
Solaris ABI: 64-bit
SUNWxorg-server package version: 6.9.0.5.11.7500,REV=0.2007.09.26
SUNWxorg-graphics-ddx package version: 6.9.0.5.11.7500,REV=0.2007.09.26
SUNWxorg-mesa package version: 6.9.0.5.11.7500,REV=0.2007.09.26
Before reporting problems, check http://sunsolve.sun.com/
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Fri Jan 25 17:27:04 2008
(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf"
(EE) LoadModule: Module bitstream does not have a bitstreamModuleData
data object.
(EE) Failed to load module "bitstream" (invalid module, 0)
dlopen: ld.so.1: Xorg: fatal: relocation error:
file /usr/X11/lib/modules/fonts/amd64//libtype1.so: symbol
Type1RegisterFontFileFunctions: referenced symbol not found
(EE) Failed to load /usr/X11/lib/modules/fonts/amd64//libtype1.so
(EE) Failed to load module "type1" (loader failed, 7)
(II) Module "ddc" already built-in
(II) Module "i2c" already built-in
(II) Module "ddc" already built-in
(II) Module "ramdac" already built-in
(II) Module "ddc" already built-in
(II) Module "i2c" already built-in
(II) Module "ramdac" already built-in
(EE) AIGLX: DRI module not loaded
(EE) AIGLX: DRI module not loaded
X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown).
FreeFontPath: FPE "/usr/X11/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" refcount is 2, should
be 1; fixing.
and the following files are attached:
Xorg.0.log latest log output (using Angelo's xorg.conf)
xorg.conf.orig My original one, Darren's fix for 3400 projector use
xorg.conf.angelo What I'm using now, works for Angelo on b78
".compiz.bad Where I got to converting my old one to work.
I hope you find this useful, and thanks again for helping out.
Ta,
Mark.
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 16:49 +0800, minskey guo wrote:
Hi, Mark,
I just installed a snv_75 from scratch, and add
Option "BusType" "PCI"
to ATI device section of xorg.conf. And then, I installed compzi via
Erwann's
compiz bundle. It works.
If you cannot set up compiz on F3400, can you send me xorg.conf,
/var/log/Xorg.0.log, /var/dt/Xerror if exists.
-minskey
Mark R. Bowyer 写道:
Hi Angelo =O)
Thanks for answering. I didn't have an .xorg.conf - that's usually a
left over from some other time - could you post me your working file,
please?
Could you also send me the output of the following on your working
system, please?
o ls -l /dev/dri
o modinfo | grep radeon
And you /var/log/Xorg.0.log would be useful, too. Just to see if I can
spot the difference. I figure I've over configured myself into a corner
here with other changes =O}
Thanks,
Mark
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 15:14 -0500, Angelo Rajadurai wrote:
Hey Mark:
I got it to work on my 3400. I'm on snv_78. Pretty straight forward.
I downloaded the radeon 3D driver from http://opensolaris.org/os/project/dri/files/
I had to copy the /etc/X11/.xorg.conf to /etc/X11/xorg.conf and then add
Option "BusType" "PCI"
Then I rebooted and installed compiz with the --with-experimental-ati-
support
option. It feels pretty zappy even with the 1GB mem I have on the
system.
Let me know if need more info
-Angelo
On Jan 25, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
Hi,
I've been having fun trying to get this working on my Ferrari 3400.
Anyone else had any luck?
Firstly, the driver installer needs to be run without Xorg running.
And
the 3400 can't work in text console mode, so I had to ssh in from an
iMac. That worked ok - "svcadm disable gdm"; "install.sh install";
"svcadm enable gdm".
I then install compiz. The wget script to check if it would run said
no, because at that stage I'd not edited my xorg.conf, so the radeon
driver wasn't in. But the compiz installer does that.
My next problem was that I was using Darren's multi headed xorg.conf,
and DRI isn't compatible with multiple heads yet. So I tried out the
SingleLayout and the CloneLayout, and neither worked much better.
Mind
you, the:
Option "AIGLX" "True"
is only added to the currently active layout by the installers, so
that
needed adding.
My main problem seems to be that neither drm nor radeon are being
modloaded by the kernel. I can "modload -p misc/drm" OK, but "modload
-p drv/radeon" fails with "can't load module: No such device or
address". Which is odd, because it shows in prtconf -v as:
& nbsp; value='pci1002,4e50.1025.57 .0' +
'pci1002,4e50.1025.57' + 'pci1025,57' + 'pci1002,4e50.0' +
'pci1002,4e50' + 'pciclass,030000' + 'pciclass,0300'
and:
9 ]grep 4e50 driver*
driver_aliases:radeon "pci1002,4e50"
So it should work, no? I've done a "reboot -- -r" and that didn't
help.
Xorg finds my card and it's supported by *its* radeon driver. Until
(from /var/log/Xorg.0.log):
:
(--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon Mobility 9600/9700 (M10/M11) NP
(AGP)" (ChipID = 0x4e50)
(--) RADEON(0): Linear framebuffer at 0xd8000000
(II) RADEON(0): AGP card detected
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
[drm] failed to load kernel module "radeon"
(EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed to open the DRM
[dri] Disabling DRI.
:
/dev/dri exists since I modloaded the drm module, but didn't before.
And it's empty =O(
Anyone got any further ideas?
Ta,
Mark.
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:19 +0100, Erwann Chenede wrote:
Hi All,
I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
check script to support
the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
Details can be found here :
http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
Cheers,
Erwann
--
| o o & nbsp; &nb sp; Software Support
Engineering,
/v\ark R. Bowyer. & nbsp; SPARC House, Guillemont Park,
`-' & nbsp; &nb sp; Minley Rd, Blackwater,
Tel: +44 (0)1252 420691 Camberley, SURREY, GU17 9QG
Fax: +44 (0)1252 421658 United Kingdom __|
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
--
| o o & nbsp; &nb sp; Software Support Engineering,
/v\ark R. Bowyer. & nbsp; SPARC House, Guillemont Park,
`-' & nbsp; &nb sp; Minley Rd, Blackwater,
T el: +44 (0)1252 420691 Camberley, SURREY, GU17 9QG
F ax: +44 (0)1252 421658 United Kingdom __|
<Xorg.0.log><xorg.conf.orig><xorg.c onf.angelo><xorg.conf.compiz.bad> _______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
124
From:
FR
Registered:
10/4/06
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy install
bundle
Posted:
Jan 28, 2008 12:26 AM
in response to: Angelo Rajadurai
|
|
Hi Angelo & Mark,
Could you send me your xorg.conf (both before compiz modification
and after) ?
I'd like to see what I can modify in my scripts to make the install
easier.
Thanks,
Erwann
Angelo Rajadurai wrote:
> Hey Mark:
>
> I got it to work on my 3400. I'm on snv_78. Pretty straight forward.
> I downloaded the radeon 3D driver from http://opensolaris.org/os/project/dri/files/
>
> I had to copy the /etc/X11/.xorg.conf to /etc/X11/xorg.conf and then add
> Option "BusType" "PCI"
>
> Then I rebooted and installed compiz with the --with-experimental-ati-
> support
> option. It feels pretty zappy even with the 1GB mem I have on the
> system.
>
> Let me know if need more info
>
> -Angelo
>
>
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been having fun trying to get this working on my Ferrari 3400.
>> Anyone else had any luck?
>>
>> Firstly, the driver installer needs to be run without Xorg running.
>> And
>> the 3400 can't work in text console mode, so I had to ssh in from an
>> iMac. That worked ok - "svcadm disable gdm"; "install.sh install";
>> "svcadm enable gdm".
>>
>> I then install compiz. The wget script to check if it would run said
>> no, because at that stage I'd not edited my xorg.conf, so the radeon
>> driver wasn't in. But the compiz installer does that.
>>
>> My next problem was that I was using Darren's multi headed xorg.conf,
>> and DRI isn't compatible with multiple heads yet. So I tried out the
>> SingleLayout and the CloneLayout, and neither worked much better.
>> Mind
>> you, the:
>>
>> Option "AIGLX" "True"
>>
>> is only added to the currently active layout by the installers, so
>> that
>> needed adding.
>>
>> My main problem seems to be that neither drm nor radeon are being
>> modloaded by the kernel. I can "modload -p misc/drm" OK, but "modload
>> -p drv/radeon" fails with "can't load module: No such device or
>> address". Which is odd, because it shows in prtconf -v as:
>>
>> value='pci1002,4e50.1025.57.0' +
>> 'pci1002,4e50.1025.57' + 'pci1025,57' + 'pci1002,4e50.0' +
>> 'pci1002,4e50' + 'pciclass,030000' + 'pciclass,0300'
>>
>> and:
>>
>> 9 ]grep 4e50 driver*
>> driver_aliases:radeon "pci1002,4e50"
>>
>> So it should work, no? I've done a "reboot -- -r" and that didn't
>> help.
>> Xorg finds my card and it's supported by *its* radeon driver. Until
>> (from /var/log/Xorg.0.log):
>>
>> :
>> (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon Mobility 9600/9700 (M10/M11) NP
>> (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x4e50)
>> (--) RADEON(0): Linear framebuffer at 0xd8000000
>> (II) RADEON(0): AGP card detected
>> drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
>> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
>> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
>> drmOpenDevice: Open failed
>> [drm] failed to load kernel module "radeon"
>> (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed to open the DRM
>> [dri] Disabling DRI.
>> :
>>
>> /dev/dri exists since I modloaded the drm module, but didn't before.
>> And it's empty =O(
>>
>> Anyone got any further ideas?
>>
>> Ta,
>> Mark.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:19 +0100, Erwann Chenede wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
>>> check script to support
>>> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
>>>
>>> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
>>>
>>> Details can be found here :
>>> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Erwann
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> | o o Software Support
>> Engineering,
>> /v\ark R. Bowyer. SPARC House, Guillemont Park,
>> `-' Minley Rd, Blackwater,
>> Tel: +44 (0)1252 420691 Camberley, SURREY, GU17 9QG
>> Fax: +44 (0)1252 421658 United Kingdom __|
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> desktop-discuss mailing list
>> desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-discuss mailing list
> desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
>
--
Erwann Chénedé,
Desktop Group, Sun Microsystems, Grenoble
[ I speak for myself, not for my employer ]
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
390
From:
IE
Registered:
6/17/05
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy install
bundle
Posted:
Jan 28, 2008 3:01 AM
in response to: moredhel
|
|
Hi Mark,
The first problem that I see with your instructions on how you installed is that
after running the install.sh script, the first thing you did was "svcadm enable
gdm" rather than an full reboot (init 6) - you need the full reboot to ensure
that the boot archive is correctly updated.
Darren.
Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been having fun trying to get this working on my Ferrari 3400.
> Anyone else had any luck?
>
> Firstly, the driver installer needs to be run without Xorg running. And
> the 3400 can't work in text console mode, so I had to ssh in from an
> iMac. That worked ok - "svcadm disable gdm"; "install.sh install";
> "svcadm enable gdm".
>
> I then install compiz. The wget script to check if it would run said
> no, because at that stage I'd not edited my xorg.conf, so the radeon
> driver wasn't in. But the compiz installer does that.
>
> My next problem was that I was using Darren's multi headed xorg.conf,
> and DRI isn't compatible with multiple heads yet. So I tried out the
> SingleLayout and the CloneLayout, and neither worked much better. Mind
> you, the:
>
> Option "AIGLX" "True"
>
> is only added to the currently active layout by the installers, so that
> needed adding.
>
> My main problem seems to be that neither drm nor radeon are being
> modloaded by the kernel. I can "modload -p misc/drm" OK, but "modload
> -p drv/radeon" fails with "can't load module: No such device or
> address". Which is odd, because it shows in prtconf -v as:
>
> value='pci1002,4e50.1025.57.0' +
> 'pci1002,4e50.1025.57' + 'pci1025,57' + 'pci1002,4e50.0' +
> 'pci1002,4e50' + 'pciclass,030000' + 'pciclass,0300'
>
> and:
>
> 9 ]grep 4e50 driver*
> driver_aliases:radeon "pci1002,4e50"
>
> So it should work, no? I've done a "reboot -- -r" and that didn't help.
> Xorg finds my card and it's supported by *its* radeon driver. Until
> (from /var/log/Xorg.0.log):
>
> :
> (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon Mobility 9600/9700 (M10/M11) NP
> (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x4e50)
> (--) RADEON(0): Linear framebuffer at 0xd8000000
> (II) RADEON(0): AGP card detected
> drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
> drmOpenDevice: Open failed
> [drm] failed to load kernel module "radeon"
> (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed to open the DRM
> [dri] Disabling DRI.
> :
>
> /dev/dri exists since I modloaded the drm module, but didn't before.
> And it's empty =O(
>
> Anyone got any further ideas?
>
> Ta,
> Mark.
>
>
> On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:19 +0100, Erwann Chenede wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
>> check script to support
>> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
>>
>> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
>>
>> Details can be found here :
>> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Erwann
>>
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
34
From:
UK
Registered:
6/14/05
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy
install bundle
Posted:
Jan 28, 2008 3:08 AM
in response to: dkenny
|
|
Hi,
Well, re-enabling gdm was required before the reboot, to ensure it came
back up with a graphical login - as I said, the 3400 doesn't do text
mode very well if the resolution gets played with, and I've been left
with a machine with flashing boxes instead of text a few times too many.
I have rebooted a few times since, including a "reboot -- -r", but I'm
not certain the boot archive has been properly rebuilt, so I'm looking
into that now.
Ta,
Mark.
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:01 +0000, Darren Kenny wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> The first problem that I see with your instructions on how you installed is that
> after running the install.sh script, the first thing you did was "svcadm enable
> gdm" rather than an full reboot (init 6) - you need the full reboot to ensure
> that the boot archive is correctly updated.
>
> Darren.
>
> Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been having fun trying to get this working on my Ferrari 3400.
> > Anyone else had any luck?
> >
> > Firstly, the driver installer needs to be run without Xorg running. And
> > the 3400 can't work in text console mode, so I had to ssh in from an
> > iMac. That worked ok - "svcadm disable gdm"; "install.sh install";
> > "svcadm enable gdm".
> >
> > I then install compiz. The wget script to check if it would run said
> > no, because at that stage I'd not edited my xorg.conf, so the radeon
> > driver wasn't in. But the compiz installer does that.
> >
> > My next problem was that I was using Darren's multi headed xorg.conf,
> > and DRI isn't compatible with multiple heads yet. So I tried out the
> > SingleLayout and the CloneLayout, and neither worked much better. Mind
> > you, the:
> >
> > Option "AIGLX" "True"
> >
> > is only added to the currently active layout by the installers, so that
> > needed adding.
> >
> > My main problem seems to be that neither drm nor radeon are being
> > modloaded by the kernel. I can "modload -p misc/drm" OK, but "modload
> > -p drv/radeon" fails with "can't load module: No such device or
> > address". Which is odd, because it shows in prtconf -v as:
> >
> > value='pci1002,4e50.1025.57.0' +
> > 'pci1002,4e50.1025.57' + 'pci1025,57' + 'pci1002,4e50.0' +
> > 'pci1002,4e50' + 'pciclass,030000' + 'pciclass,0300'
> >
> > and:
> >
> > 9 ]grep 4e50 driver*
> > driver_aliases:radeon "pci1002,4e50"
> >
> > So it should work, no? I've done a "reboot -- -r" and that didn't help.
> > Xorg finds my card and it's supported by *its* radeon driver. Until
> > (from /var/log/Xorg.0.log):
> >
> > :
> > (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon Mobility 9600/9700 (M10/M11) NP
> > (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x4e50)
> > (--) RADEON(0): Linear framebuffer at 0xd8000000
> > (II) RADEON(0): AGP card detected
> > drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
> > drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
> > drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
> > drmOpenDevice: Open failed
> > [drm] failed to load kernel module "radeon"
> > (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed to open the DRM
> > [dri] Disabling DRI.
> > :
> >
> > /dev/dri exists since I modloaded the drm module, but didn't before.
> > And it's empty =O(
> >
> > Anyone got any further ideas?
> >
> > Ta,
> > Mark.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:19 +0100, Erwann Chenede wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
> >> check script to support
> >> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
> >>
> >> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
> >>
> >> Details can be found here :
> >> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Erwann
> >>
--
| o o Software Support Engineering,
/v\ark R. Bowyer. SPARC House, Guillemont Park,
`-' Minley Rd, Blackwater,
Tel: +44 (0)1252 420691 Camberley, SURREY, GU17 9QG
Fax: +44 (0)1252 421658 United Kingdom __|
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
390
From:
IE
Registered:
6/17/05
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy install
bundle
Posted:
Jan 28, 2008 3:11 AM
in response to: moredhel
|
|
Hi Mark,
"reboot -r" doesn't rebuild the archive AFAIK, but maybe that has changed....
You may need to go into a failsafe now ;(
In installing the drivers you're also installing new text-mode drivers, do maybe
it might change... ;)
Darren.
Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, re-enabling gdm was required before the reboot, to ensure it came
> back up with a graphical login - as I said, the 3400 doesn't do text
> mode very well if the resolution gets played with, and I've been left
> with a machine with flashing boxes instead of text a few times too many.
> I have rebooted a few times since, including a "reboot -- -r", but I'm
> not certain the boot archive has been properly rebuilt, so I'm looking
> into that now.
>
> Ta,
> Mark.
>
>
> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:01 +0000, Darren Kenny wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> The first problem that I see with your instructions on how you installed is that
>> after running the install.sh script, the first thing you did was "svcadm enable
>> gdm" rather than an full reboot (init 6) - you need the full reboot to ensure
>> that the boot archive is correctly updated.
>>
>> Darren.
>>
>> Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been having fun trying to get this working on my Ferrari 3400.
>>> Anyone else had any luck?
>>>
>>> Firstly, the driver installer needs to be run without Xorg running. And
>>> the 3400 can't work in text console mode, so I had to ssh in from an
>>> iMac. That worked ok - "svcadm disable gdm"; "install.sh install";
>>> "svcadm enable gdm".
>>>
>>> I then install compiz. The wget script to check if it would run said
>>> no, because at that stage I'd not edited my xorg.conf, so the radeon
>>> driver wasn't in. But the compiz installer does that.
>>>
>>> My next problem was that I was using Darren's multi headed xorg.conf,
>>> and DRI isn't compatible with multiple heads yet. So I tried out the
>>> SingleLayout and the CloneLayout, and neither worked much better. Mind
>>> you, the:
>>>
>>> Option "AIGLX" "True"
>>>
>>> is only added to the currently active layout by the installers, so that
>>> needed adding.
>>>
>>> My main problem seems to be that neither drm nor radeon are being
>>> modloaded by the kernel. I can "modload -p misc/drm" OK, but "modload
>>> -p drv/radeon" fails with "can't load module: No such device or
>>> address". Which is odd, because it shows in prtconf -v as:
>>>
>>> value='pci1002,4e50.1025.57.0' +
>>> 'pci1002,4e50.1025.57' + 'pci1025,57' + 'pci1002,4e50.0' +
>>> 'pci1002,4e50' + 'pciclass,030000' + 'pciclass,0300'
>>>
>>> and:
>>>
>>> 9 ]grep 4e50 driver*
>>> driver_aliases:radeon "pci1002,4e50"
>>>
>>> So it should work, no? I've done a "reboot -- -r" and that didn't help.
>>> Xorg finds my card and it's supported by *its* radeon driver. Until
>>> (from /var/log/Xorg.0.log):
>>>
>>> :
>>> (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon Mobility 9600/9700 (M10/M11) NP
>>> (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x4e50)
>>> (--) RADEON(0): Linear framebuffer at 0xd8000000
>>> (II) RADEON(0): AGP card detected
>>> drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
>>> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
>>> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
>>> drmOpenDevice: Open failed
>>> [drm] failed to load kernel module "radeon"
>>> (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed to open the DRM
>>> [dri] Disabling DRI.
>>> :
>>>
>>> /dev/dri exists since I modloaded the drm module, but didn't before.
>>> And it's empty =O(
>>>
>>> Anyone got any further ideas?
>>>
>>> Ta,
>>> Mark.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:19 +0100, Erwann Chenede wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
>>>> check script to support
>>>> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
>>>>
>>>> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
>>>>
>>>> Details can be found here :
>>>> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Erwann
>>>>
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
34
From:
UK
Registered:
6/14/05
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy
install bundle
Posted:
Jan 28, 2008 3:26 AM
in response to: dkenny
|
|
Hi,
**** - that was it! My drm and radeon drivers are now installed, and
I've got compiz and emerald running on my 3400, just like on my Ultra20.
=O)
Thanks to everyone, and if anything needs to be changed, then maybe a
comment should be added to the driver loaders explaining that "bootadm
update_archive" needs to be run afterwards - or even run it in the
script, as frkit does? I don't tend to use init 6 to reboot, and I'm
sure many others don't either (I'm a big fan of poweroff or "uadmin 2 0"
- they're so much faster, and fine in most all circumstances).
Ta,
Mark.
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:11 +0000, Darren Kenny wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> "reboot -r" doesn't rebuild the archive AFAIK, but maybe that has changed....
>
> You may need to go into a failsafe now ;(
>
> In installing the drivers you're also installing new text-mode drivers, do maybe
> it might change... ;)
>
> Darren.
>
> Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Well, re-enabling gdm was required before the reboot, to ensure it came
> > back up with a graphical login - as I said, the 3400 doesn't do text
> > mode very well if the resolution gets played with, and I've been left
> > with a machine with flashing boxes instead of text a few times too many.
> > I have rebooted a few times since, including a "reboot -- -r", but I'm
> > not certain the boot archive has been properly rebuilt, so I'm looking
> > into that now.
> >
> > Ta,
> > Mark.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:01 +0000, Darren Kenny wrote:
> >> Hi Mark,
> >>
> >> The first problem that I see with your instructions on how you installed is that
> >> after running the install.sh script, the first thing you did was "svcadm enable
> >> gdm" rather than an full reboot (init 6) - you need the full reboot to ensure
> >> that the boot archive is correctly updated.
> >>
> >> Darren.
> >>
> >> Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I've been having fun trying to get this working on my Ferrari 3400.
> >>> Anyone else had any luck?
> >>>
> >>> Firstly, the driver installer needs to be run without Xorg running. And
> >>> the 3400 can't work in text console mode, so I had to ssh in from an
> >>> iMac. That worked ok - "svcadm disable gdm"; "install.sh install";
> >>> "svcadm enable gdm".
> >>>
> >>> I then install compiz. The wget script to check if it would run said
> >>> no, because at that stage I'd not edited my xorg.conf, so the radeon
> >>> driver wasn't in. But the compiz installer does that.
> >>>
> >>> My next problem was that I was using Darren's multi headed xorg.conf,
> >>> and DRI isn't compatible with multiple heads yet. So I tried out the
> >>> SingleLayout and the CloneLayout, and neither worked much better. Mind
> >>> you, the:
> >>>
> >>> Option "AIGLX" "True"
> >>>
> >>> is only added to the currently active layout by the installers, so that
> >>> needed adding.
> >>>
> >>> My main problem seems to be that neither drm nor radeon are being
> >>> modloaded by the kernel. I can "modload -p misc/drm" OK, but "modload
> >>> -p drv/radeon" fails with "can't load module: No such device or
> >>> address". Which is odd, because it shows in prtconf -v as:
> >>>
> >>> value='pci1002,4e50.1025.57.0' +
> >>> 'pci1002,4e50.1025.57' + 'pci1025,57' + 'pci1002,4e50.0' +
> >>> 'pci1002,4e50' + 'pciclass,030000' + 'pciclass,0300'
> >>>
> >>> and:
> >>>
> >>> 9 ]grep 4e50 driver*
> >>> driver_aliases:radeon "pci1002,4e50"
> >>>
> >>> So it should work, no? I've done a "reboot -- -r" and that didn't help.
> >>> Xorg finds my card and it's supported by *its* radeon driver. Until
> >>> (from /var/log/Xorg.0.log):
> >>>
> >>> :
> >>> (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon Mobility 9600/9700 (M10/M11) NP
> >>> (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x4e50)
> >>> (--) RADEON(0): Linear framebuffer at 0xd8000000
> >>> (II) RADEON(0): AGP card detected
> >>> drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
> >>> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
> >>> drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
> >>> drmOpenDevice: Open failed
> >>> [drm] failed to load kernel module "radeon"
> >>> (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed to open the DRM
> >>> [dri] Disabling DRI.
> >>> :
> >>>
> >>> /dev/dri exists since I modloaded the drm module, but didn't before.
> >>> And it's empty =O(
> >>>
> >>> Anyone got any further ideas?
> >>>
> >>> Ta,
> >>> Mark.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:19 +0100, Erwann Chenede wrote:
> >>>> Hi All,
> >>>>
> >>>> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
> >>>> check script to support
> >>>> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
> >>>>
> >>>> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
> >>>>
> >>>> Details can be found here :
> >>>> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>> Erwann
> >>>>
--
| o o Software Support Engineering,
/v\ark R. Bowyer. SPARC House, Guillemont Park,
`-' Minley Rd, Blackwater,
Tel: +44 (0)1252 420691 Camberley, SURREY, GU17 9QG
Fax: +44 (0)1252 421658 United Kingdom __|
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
70
From:
US
Registered:
3/20/06
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy install
bundle
Posted:
Feb 5, 2008 4:21 PM
in response to: erwannc
|
|
Hi,
Thanks for the great work.
Installed Nevada B82 on my Ferrari 4005 this morning, little problem with localhost not being put into /etc/hosts which stopped gdm coming up.
Installed the DRI drivers, took glxgears from 400 frames per second to 2300.
Compiz installed fine using your instructions.
Has anyone else reported strange white borders on gnome control panel ?
Thanks
Dave
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:19 +0100, Erwann Chenede wrote:
<PRE>
Hi All,
I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
check script to support
the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
Details can be found here :
http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
Cheers,
Erwann
</PRE>
<TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<TD>
<TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" WIDTH="500">
<TR>
<TD WIDTH="136" VALIGN="top">
</TD>
<TD WIDTH="364" VALIGN="top">
David Clack
Solaris X86 Evangelist
Senior Systems Engineer
OEM Software Sales
Sun Microsystems
642, Chinook Ave SE, Ocean Shores, WA, USA, 98569
Phone +1-360-289-2158
Fax +1-360-289-2091
Mobile +1-206-265-1904
Email David dot Clack at Sun dot COM
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD COLSPAN="2" VALIGN="top">
</TD>
<TD>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
390
From:
IE
Registered:
6/17/05
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy install
bundle
Posted:
Feb 6, 2008 3:42 AM
in response to: dclack
|
|
Hi David,
That "white" border seems to be the "shadow" :)
Seems to be some issue with the default values on the ATI card, I've managed to
get a more pleasing effect by running ccsm and editing the "Window Decoration"
options to be :
Shadow Radius: 18
Shadow Opacity: 0.8
Shadow Color: #00000 (Black)
Shadow OffsetX: 16
Shadow OffsetY: 0
I can't remember what the default values were, maybe you could post them here...
HTH,
Darren.
David Clack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the great work.
>
> Installed Nevada B82 on my Ferrari 4005 this morning, little problem
> with localhost not being put into /etc/hosts which stopped gdm coming up.
>
> Installed the DRI drivers, took glxgears from 400 frames per second to 2300.
>
> Compiz installed fine using your instructions.
>
> Has anyone else reported strange white borders on gnome control panel ?
>
> Thanks
> Dave
>
> On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:19 +0100, Erwann Chenede wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
>> check script to support
>> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
>>
>> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
>>
>> Details can be found here :
>> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Erwann
>>
> <http://
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *David Clack*
>
> *Solaris X86 Evangelist*
> *Senior Systems Engineer *
> *OEM Software Sales*
> *Sun Microsystems*
> *642, Chinook Ave SE, Ocean Shores, WA, USA, 98569*
> Phone +1-360-289-2158
> Fax +1-360-289-2091
> Mobile +1-206-265-1904
> Email David dot Clack at Sun dot COM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <http://
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-discuss mailing list
> desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
|
|
|
|
|
Posts:
70
From:
US
Registered:
3/20/06
|
|
|
|
Re: ATI Radeon support for compiz easy
install bundle
Posted:
Feb 6, 2008 9:39 AM
in response to: dkenny
|
|
That worked Thanks
Defaults
Shadow Radius: 8
Shadow Opacity: 0.5
Shadow Color: #00000 (Black)
Shadow OffsetX: 1
Shadow OffsetY: 1
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 11:42 +0000, Darren Kenny wrote:
<PRE>
Hi David,
That "white" border seems to be the "shadow" :)
Seems to be some issue with the default values on the ATI card, I've managed to
get a more pleasing effect by running ccsm and editing the "Window Decoration"
options to be :
Shadow Radius: 18
Shadow Opacity: 0.8
Shadow Color: #00000 (Black)
Shadow OffsetX: 16
Shadow OffsetY: 0
I can't remember what the default values were, maybe you could post them here...
HTH,
Darren.
David Clack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the great work.
>
> Installed Nevada B82 on my Ferrari 4005 this morning, little problem
> with localhost not being put into /etc/hosts which stopped gdm coming up.
>
> Installed the DRI drivers, took glxgears from 400 frames per second to 2300.
>
> Compiz installed fine using your instructions.
>
> Has anyone else reported strange white borders on gnome control panel ?
>
> Thanks
> Dave
>
> On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:19 +0100, Erwann Chenede wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've updated my compiz easy install bundle and my configuration
>> check script to support
>> the ATI radeon driver developed by Minskey.
>>
>> So far it's only been tested on Ferrari 4000 laptop.
>>
>> Details can be found here :
>> http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Erwann
>>
> <http://www.sun.com/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *David Clack*
>
> *Solaris X86 Evangelist*
> *Senior Systems Engineer *
> *OEM Software Sales*
> *Sun Microsystems*
> *642, Chinook Ave SE, Ocean Shores, WA, USA, 98569*
> Phone +1-360-289-2158
> Fax +1-360-289-2091
> Mobile +1-206-265-1904
> Email David dot Clack at Sun dot COM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <http://www.sun.com/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-discuss mailing list
> desktop-discuss at opensolaris dot org
</PRE>
<TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<TD>
<TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" WIDTH="500">
<TR>
<TD WIDTH="136" VALIGN="top">
</TD>
<TD WIDTH="364" VALIGN="top">
David Clack
Solaris X86 Evangelist
Senior Systems Engineer
OEM Software Sales
Sun Microsystems
642, Chinook Ave SE, Ocean Shores, WA, USA, 98569
Phone +1-360-289-2158
Fax +1-360-289-2091
Mobile +1-206-265-1904
Email David dot Clack at Sun dot COM
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD COLSPAN="2" VALIGN="top">
</TD>
<TD>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
|
|
|
|
|
