OpenSolaris

Discussions Communities Projects Download Source Browser

Home » OpenSolaris Forums » indiana » discuss

Thread: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)

Welcome, Guest Help
Login Login
Guest Settings Guest Settings
Reply to this Thread Reply to this Thread Search Forum Search Forum Back to Thread List Back to Thread List

Permlink Replies: 31 - Last Post: Sep 9, 2008 3:43 AM by: andrewk8
comay

Posts: 962
From: US

Registered: 3/9/05
[indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 4, 2008 1:46 PM

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

The OpenSolaris development package repository

http://pkg.opensolaris.org/

has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_96 including major fixes
to the Caiman "Slim Install" and the Image Packaging System (IPS). In
addition, NetBeans 6.1 is now available in the repository.

Users who wish to update their system to the development build can do
so using the "image-update" facility provided by the pkg(1) command.
For important information about "image-update", see the instructions at

http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/rn3/image-update/

IMPORTANT NOTE: The development builds have undergone limited testing
and users should expect to uncover issues as the next release is
developed.

ISO images are being made available for this build via BitTorrent.
Torrent files are provided as follows

Primary Languages, gzip compression, 738MB
http://dlc.sun.com/torrents/info/osol-0811-96.iso.torrent
(if burned to media, image should be burned to a DVD)

All Languages, LZMA compression, 656MB
http://dlc.sun.com/torrents/info/osol-0811-96-global.iso.torrent
(if burned to media, image can be burned to a CD)

MD5 checksums for these images
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/files/md5sums_96.txt

New packages in this repository update
======================================
SUNWgsed gsed - GNU implementation of sed, the Unix
SUNWlibdatrie libdatrie
SUNWlibgsf GNOME Structured File Library
SUNWlibthai libthai
SUNWscim Smart Common Input Method Framework
SUNWscim-anthy Smart Common Input Method Framework - libanthy
SUNWscim-chewing Smart Common Input Method Framework
SUNWscim-hangul Smart Common Input Method Framework - libhangul
SUNWscim-pinyin Smart Common Input Method Framework - Smart
SUNWscim-sunpinyin Smart Common Input Method Framework - SunPinyin
SUNWscim-tables Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable
SUNWscim-tables-chinese Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable
SUNWscim-tables-extra Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable
SUNWscim-tables-india Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable
SUNWscim-tables-japanese Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable
SUNWscim-tables-korean Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable
SUNWscim-thai Smart Common Input Method Framework - libthai
SUNWw3m Desktop search tool - support libraries

Known issues in this repository update
======================================
6733880 6677411/6677801/PSARC/2008/342 broke VirtualBox by polluting its
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6733880

When starting up, VirtualBox terminates prematurely with the
following message reported

ERROR: 0 bytes read from child process

Work-around:

Set the environment variable LD_NODIRECT to 1 prior to
executing VirtualBox

$ LD_NODIRECT=1 VirtualBox

3050 swap should be mandatory on systems with less than 1GB memory
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3050

On systems or virtual machines with 768MB or less of memory,
the installer can hang.

Work-around:

In the case of a virtual machine, allocate 1GB during
the installation phase. Otherwise, provide at least
the amount of disk space recommended by the installer
so that a swap volume will be created.

3200 "Malformed URL: None" when mirrors attribute on an authority is None
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3200

Systems that were originally installed with Developer Preview 2
can fail to "pkg image-update" with the following message
reported

ValueError: Malformed URL: None

Work-around:

Edit the file /var/pkg/cfg_cache and change any lines
of the form

mirrors = None

to instead read

mirrors = []

3214 additional NetBeans 6.1 dependencies needed
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3214

On systems that have installed a subset of NetBeans 6.1
packages including SUNWnetbeans-ruby and/or
SUNWnetbeans-javaee, executing the IDE may report certain
modules as being missing.

Work-around:

Manually install the dependent SUNWlibnb-gsf1 package

$ pfexec pkg install SUNWlibnb-gsf1

Image Packaging System (IPS) specific bugs addressed in this repository update
============================================================================= =
45 "move" action for files that are renamed, but must be preserved
590 actions should be evaluated across entire image transformation
1018 actions with payloads should include all sizes and hashes
1461 depot should ignore requests for absent files
1730 package containing space in name handled incorrectly
1905 GUI package manager slow responsiveness
2227 File action should verify its checksums
2261 Support mirroring of package content
2285 Versions lists unavailable operations
2309 pkg.depotd fails when -d argument is a relative pathname
2330 Imageconfig incorrectly parses boolean config options
2333 control over access / error log destination desired
2402 pkg unable to remove executable file that is in use on Windows
2415 EPERM on Windows when updating a file in use
2542 Make User-agent value deal with newer Windows versions
2556 client should measure download progress by compressed size
2732 Unable to publish large file on Windows XP
2735 pylint shows up various errors in the pkg code that need to be fixed.
2778 Need a way of adding the same commands to every package
2779 It would be handy to confine chatrr_glob to a single type
2790 The GUI should check if there is newer SUNWipkg and SUNWipkg-gui before
2795 two versions of a package can be installed
2818 We should include pyOpenSSL in the gate
2838 pkg image-update to b95 died while updating indexes
2840 SUNWipkg-gui-l10n has incorrect group for many directories
2852 resync repository to snv_96
2855 pkg.depotd --readonly won't serve search
2884 Need Netbeans 6.1 packages in repo
2889 gui doesn't update search indices
2890 IPS's SUNWkdc does not have correct package dependencies
2892 SUNWpython-cherrypy package should only include "core" files
2893 Upgrading to Snv_95 failed by IPS GUI
2905 pkg.depotd should gracefully handle bad manifest requests
2907 provide linux distro name in user-agent
2931 RSS/Atom feed has validation errors
2935 pkg.depotd traceback when unsupported operation version requested
2939 SUNWfreetype2 didn't actually go to 2.3.7 in build 96
2940 pyOpenSSL tarball and directory need to be in .hgignore
2951 Client should check if its SSL certificates have expired
2955 rebuild-index causes uninstall of pkg to fail after pkg's authority is
2971 putback of 2261 broke info operation
2986 test suite outputs failure messages from cli test subprocesses instead of
2988 FileList should use pkg.csize when possible
2990 test_contents_2 needs to sort lines
3054 logfiles not properly closed during test suite execution
3057 Need to include pyopenssl in clusters for build 96
3084 updating missing files tracebacks when trying to chmod
3091 importer fails after fix for bug 3057
3099 download cache must purge invalid contents
3127 backpublished SUNWipkg needs to depend on pyopenssl
3129 need to fold SUNWipkg-gui-l10n into SUNWipkg-gui
3158 SUNWnetbeans-javase is missing a dependency

Caiman installer specific bugs addressed in this repository update
==================================================================
1023 be_change_grub_default doesn't remove the temporary file when no boot
1049 beadm list -ds output could have a lot less Header information
1979 libbe: be_activate needs to run installgrub
2161 installer should be compliant with "ZFS root" design specification
2196 libbe should support non-legacy mounted zfs roots
2577 "beadm umount" should be an alias for "beadm unmount"
2843 libbe: destroying a BE should always destroy the snapshot used to create
2866 transfer module cpio functionality should allow cpio args to be passed in
2867 transfer module should allow ips set-authority to specify the preferred
2868 transfer module ips_retrieve should not modify cfg_cache
2887 beadm list space used totals for BE not intuitive
2891 beadm destroy has an annoying commandline
2918 transfer module - log_progress can write to the wrong
2943 be_init() fails to create new BE on Sparc platform
2949 Define white space and menu.lst location in header file and suppress
2963 beadm rename a BE to an existing BE will result in core dump
3009 slim_source gate fails to build on 96
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


ormandj

Posts: 192
From:

Registered: 2/21/06
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 4, 2008 9:46 PM   in response to: comay

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

Error updating b95 -> b96:

ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg image-update
Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
DOWNLOAD           & nbsp;            &nb sp;           PKGS       FILES     XFER (MB)
Completed           &nbs p;                     616/616   3890/3890 613.78/613.78

PHASE                         &n bsp;            &nbs p;  ACTIONS
Removal Phase            &n bsp;            &nbs p;    3509/3509
Update Phase            &n bsp;            &nbs p;   13012/91994 Action upgrade failed for 'var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' (pkg:/SUNWcs):
 OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmpF1VYgA/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg:
An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmpF1VYgA/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
 The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made to a clone of the running system.  This clone is mounted at /tmp/tmpF1VYgA should you wish to inspect it.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1734, in ?
    ret = main_func()
  File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1696, in main_func
    return image_update(img, pargs)
  File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 527, in image_update
    img.imageplan.execute()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 499, in execute
    p.execute_update(src, dest)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py", line 292, in execute_update
    dest.install(self, src)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line 115, in install
    os.chmod(temp, mode)
OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmpF1VYgA/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg:

This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ uname -a
SunOS opensolaris-ormandj 5.11 snv_95 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$

Should I file a bug, as it suggests, or am I missing something? I've not yet re-tried the operation.

Cheers,
David

On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:46 PM, <David dot Comay at sun dot com> wrote:
The OpenSolaris development package repository

       http://pkg.opensolaris.org/

has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_96 including major fixes
to the Caiman "Slim Install" and the Image Packaging System (IPS).  In
addition, NetBeans 6.1 is now available in the repository.

Users who wish to update their system to the development build can do
so using the "image-update" facility provided by the pkg(1) command.
For important information about "image-update", see the instructions at

       http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/rn3/image-update/

IMPORTANT NOTE: The development builds have undergone limited testing
and users should expect to uncover issues as the next release is
developed.

ISO images are being made available for this build via BitTorrent.
Torrent files are provided as follows

       Primary Languages, gzip compression, 738MB
       http://dlc.sun.com/torrents/info/osol-0811-96.iso.torrent
       (if burned to media, image should be burned to a DVD)

       All Languages, LZMA compression, 656MB
       http://dlc.sun.com/torrents/info/osol-0811-96-global.iso.torrent
       (if burned to media, image can be burned to a CD)

       MD5 checksums for these images
       http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/files/md5sums_96.txt

New packages in this repository update
======================================
SUNWgsed                        gsed - GNU implementation of sed, the Unix
SUNWlibdatrie                   libdatrie
SUNWlibgsf                      GNOME Structured File Library
SUNWlibthai                     libthai
SUNWscim                        Smart Common Input Method Framework
SUNWscim-anthy                  Smart Common Input Method Framework - libanthy
SUNWscim-chewing                Smart Common Input Method Framework
SUNWscim-hangul                 Smart Common Input Method Framework - libhangul
SUNWscim-pinyin                 Smart Common Input Method Framework - Smart
SUNWscim-sunpinyin              Smart Common Input Method Framework - SunPinyin
SUNWscim-tables                 Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable
SUNWscim-tables-chinese         Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable
SUNWscim-tables-extra           Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable
SUNWscim-tables-india           Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable
SUNWscim-tables-japanese        Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable
SUNWscim-tables-korean          Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable
SUNWscim-thai                   Smart Common Input Method Framework - libthai
SUNWw3m                         Desktop search tool - support libraries

Known issues in this repository update
======================================
6733880 6677411/6677801/PSARC/2008/342 broke VirtualBox by polluting its
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6733880

       When starting up, VirtualBox terminates prematurely with the
       following message reported

               ERROR: 0 bytes read from child process

       Work-around:

               Set the environment variable LD_NODIRECT to 1 prior to
               executing VirtualBox

               $ LD_NODIRECT=1 VirtualBox

3050 swap should be mandatory on systems with less than 1GB memory
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3050

       On systems or virtual machines with 768MB or less of memory,
       the installer can hang.

       Work-around:

               In the case of a virtual machine, allocate 1GB during
               the installation phase.  Otherwise, provide at least
               the amount of disk space recommended by the installer
               so that a swap volume will be created.

3200 "Malformed URL: None" when mirrors attribute on an authority is None
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3200

       Systems that were originally installed with Developer Preview 2
       can fail to "pkg image-update" with the following message
       reported

               ValueError: Malformed URL: None

       Work-around:

               Edit the file /var/pkg/cfg_cache and change any lines
               of the form

                       mirrors = None

               to instead read

                       mirrors = []

3214 additional NetBeans 6.1 dependencies needed
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3214

       On systems that have installed a subset of NetBeans 6.1
       packages including SUNWnetbeans-ruby and/or
       SUNWnetbeans-javaee, executing the IDE may report certain
       modules as being missing.

       Work-around:

               Manually install the dependent SUNWlibnb-gsf1 package

                       $ pfexec pkg install SUNWlibnb-gsf1

Image Packaging System (IPS) specific bugs addressed in this repository update
==============================================================================< br> 45 "move" action for files that are renamed, but must be preserved
590 actions should be evaluated across entire image transformation
1018 actions with payloads should include all sizes and hashes
1461 depot should ignore requests for absent files
1730 package containing space in name handled incorrectly
1905 GUI package manager slow responsiveness
2227 File action should verify its checksums
2261 Support mirroring of package content
2285 Versions lists unavailable operations
2309 pkg.depotd fails when -d argument is a relative pathname
2330 Imageconfig incorrectly parses boolean config options
2333 control over access / error log destination desired
2402 pkg unable to remove executable file that is in use on Windows
2415 EPERM on Windows when updating a file in use
2542 Make User-agent value deal with newer Windows versions
2556 client should measure download progress by compressed size
2732 Unable to publish large file on Windows XP
2735 pylint shows up various errors in the pkg code that need to be fixed.
2778 Need a way of adding the same commands to every package
2779 It would be handy to confine chatrr_glob to a single type
2790 The GUI should check if there is newer SUNWipkg and SUNWipkg-gui before
2795 two versions of a package can be installed
2818 We should include pyOpenSSL in the gate
2838 pkg image-update to b95 died while updating indexes
2840 SUNWipkg-gui-l10n has incorrect group for many directories
2852 resync repository to snv_96
2855 pkg.depotd --readonly won't serve search
2884 Need Netbeans 6.1 packages in repo
2889 gui doesn't update search indices
2890 IPS's SUNWkdc does not have correct package dependencies
2892 SUNWpython-cherrypy package should only include "core" files
2893 Upgrading to Snv_95 failed by IPS GUI
2905 pkg.depotd should gracefully handle bad manifest requests
2907 provide linux distro name in user-agent
2931 RSS/Atom feed has validation errors
2935 pkg.depotd traceback when unsupported operation version requested
2939 SUNWfreetype2 didn't actually go to 2.3.7 in build 96
2940 pyOpenSSL tarball and directory need to be in .hgignore
2951 Client should check if its SSL certificates have expired
2955 rebuild-index causes uninstall of pkg to fail after pkg's authority is
2971 putback of 2261 broke info operation
2986 test suite outputs failure messages from cli test subprocesses instead of
2988 FileList should use pkg.csize when possible
2990 test_contents_2 needs to sort lines
3054 logfiles not properly closed during test suite execution
3057 Need to include pyopenssl in clusters for build 96
3084 updating missing files tracebacks when trying to chmod
3091 importer fails after fix for bug 3057
3099 download cache must purge invalid contents
3127 backpublished SUNWipkg needs to depend on pyopenssl
3129 need to fold SUNWipkg-gui-l10n into SUNWipkg-gui
3158 SUNWnetbeans-javase is missing a dependency

Caiman installer specific bugs addressed in this repository update
==================================================================
1023 be_change_grub_default doesn't remove the temporary file when no boot
1049 beadm list -ds output could have a lot less Header information
1979 libbe: be_activate needs to run installgrub
2161 installer should be compliant with "ZFS root" design specification
2196 libbe should support non-legacy mounted zfs roots
2577 "beadm umount" should be an alias for "beadm unmount"
2843 libbe: destroying a BE should always destroy the snapshot used to create
2866 transfer module cpio functionality should allow cpio args to be passed in
2867 transfer module should allow ips set-authority to specify the preferred
2868 transfer module ips_retrieve should not modify cfg_cache
2887 beadm list space used totals for BE not intuitive
2891 beadm destroy has an annoying commandline
2918 transfer module - log_progress can write to the wrong
2943 be_init() fails to create new BE on Sparc platform
2949 Define white space and menu.lst location in header file and suppress
2963 beadm rename a BE to an existing BE will result in core dump
3009 slim_source gate fails to build on 96
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

_______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


twisti

Posts: 74
From: AT

Registered: 5/27/08
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 5, 2008 12:33 AM   in response to: comay

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 13:46 -0700, David dot Comay at Sun dot COM wrote:
> The OpenSolaris development package repository
>
> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
>
> has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_96 including major fixes
> to the Caiman "Slim Install" and the Image Packaging System (IPS). In
> addition, NetBeans 6.1 is now available in the repository.

I get this error:

root@workstation:~# pkg refresh
root@workstation:~# pkg info -r SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95
Name: SUNWipkg
Summary:
State: Not installed
Authority: opensolaris.org (preferred)
Version: 0.5.11
Build Release: 5.11
Branch: 0.95
Packaging Date: Fri Aug 29 15:16:54 2008
Size: 1.5 MB
FMRI: pkg:/SUNWipkg@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080829T151654Z
root@workstation:~# pkg install SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95
Creating Plan -Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1734, in ?
ret = main_func()
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1698, in main_func
return install(img, pargs)
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 601, in install
filters = filters, verbose = verbose, noexecute = noexecute)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 1704, in make_install_plan
ip.evaluate()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 354, in evaluate
self.evaluate_fmri(f)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 283, in evaluate_fmri
self.evaluate_fmri(cf)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 206, in evaluate_fmri
m = self.image.get_manifest(pfmri)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 554, in get_manifest
m = self._fetch_manifest_with_retries(fmri)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 472, in _fetch_manifest_with_retries
m = self._fetch_manifest(fmri)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 497, in _fetch_manifest
mcontent = retrieve.get_manifest(self, fmri)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/retrieve.py", line 76, in get_manifest
raise NameError, "could not retrieve manifest '%s' from '%s'" % \
NameError: could not retrieve manifest 'SUNWpython-pyopenssl@0.7%2C5.11-0.96%3A20080829T151256Z' from 'http://pkg.opensolaris.org:80'
pkg:

This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.

- twisti

_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


bandy

Posts: 353
From: RO

Registered: 2/16/07
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 5, 2008 12:34 AM   in response to: twisti

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

same here

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Christian Thalinger
<twisti at complang dot tuwien dot ac dot at> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 13:46 -0700, David dot Comay at Sun dot COM wrote:
>> The OpenSolaris development package repository
>>
>> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
>>
>> has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_96 including major fixes
>> to the Caiman "Slim Install" and the Image Packaging System (IPS). In
>> addition, NetBeans 6.1 is now available in the repository.
>
> I get this error:
>
> root@workstation:~# pkg refresh
> root@workstation:~# pkg info -r SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95
> Name: SUNWipkg
> Summary:
> State: Not installed
> Authority: opensolaris.org (preferred)
> Version: 0.5.11
> Build Release: 5.11
> Branch: 0.95
> Packaging Date: Fri Aug 29 15:16:54 2008
> Size: 1.5 MB
> FMRI: pkg:/SUNWipkg@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080829T151654Z
> root@workstation:~# pkg install SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95
> Creating Plan -Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1734, in ?
> ret = main_func()
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1698, in main_func
> return install(img, pargs)
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 601, in install
> filters = filters, verbose = verbose, noexecute = noexecute)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 1704, in make_install_plan
> ip.evaluate()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 354, in evaluate
> self.evaluate_fmri(f)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 283, in evaluate_fmri
> self.evaluate_fmri(cf)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 206, in evaluate_fmri
> m = self.image.get_manifest(pfmri)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 554, in get_manifest
> m = self._fetch_manifest_with_retries(fmri)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 472, in _fetch_manifest_with_retries
> m = self._fetch_manifest(fmri)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 497, in _fetch_manifest
> mcontent = retrieve.get_manifest(self, fmri)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/retrieve.py", line 76, in get_manifest
> raise NameError, "could not retrieve manifest '%s' from '%s'" % \
> NameError: could not retrieve manifest 'SUNWpython-pyopenssl@0.7%2C5.11-0.96%3A20080829T151256Z' from 'http://pkg.opensolaris.org:80'
> pkg:
>
> This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
> problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
> above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
>
> - twisti
>
> _______________________________________________
> indiana-discuss mailing list
> indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
>



--
Andy
http://blog.sartek.net
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


ss39446

Posts: 143
From: IN

Registered: 9/22/05
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 5, 2008 1:45 AM   in response to: bandy

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

+1 Me too

-Siva

Andras Barna wrote:
> same here
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Christian Thalinger
> <twisti at complang dot tuwien dot ac dot at> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 13:46 -0700, David dot Comay at Sun dot COM wrote:
>>
>>> The OpenSolaris development package repository
>>>
>>> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
>>>
>>> has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_96 including major fixes
>>> to the Caiman "Slim Install" and the Image Packaging System (IPS). In
>>> addition, NetBeans 6.1 is now available in the repository.
>>>
>> I get this error:
>>
>> root@workstation:~# pkg refresh
>> root@workstation:~# pkg info -r SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95
>> Name: SUNWipkg
>> Summary:
>> State: Not installed
>> Authority: opensolaris.org (preferred)
>> Version: 0.5.11
>> Build Release: 5.11
>> Branch: 0.95
>> Packaging Date: Fri Aug 29 15:16:54 2008
>> Size: 1.5 MB
>> FMRI: pkg:/SUNWipkg@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080829T151654Z
>> root@workstation:~# pkg install SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95
>> Creating Plan -Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1734, in ?
>> ret = main_func()
>> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1698, in main_func
>> return install(img, pargs)
>> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 601, in install
>> filters = filters, verbose = verbose, noexecute = noexecute)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 1704, in make_install_plan
>> ip.evaluate()
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 354, in evaluate
>> self.evaluate_fmri(f)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 283, in evaluate_fmri
>> self.evaluate_fmri(cf)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 206, in evaluate_fmri
>> m = self.image.get_manifest(pfmri)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 554, in get_manifest
>> m = self._fetch_manifest_with_retries(fmri)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 472, in _fetch_manifest_with_retries
>> m = self._fetch_manifest(fmri)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 497, in _fetch_manifest
>> mcontent = retrieve.get_manifest(self, fmri)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/retrieve.py", line 76, in get_manifest
>> raise NameError, "could not retrieve manifest '%s' from '%s'" % \
>> NameError: could not retrieve manifest 'SUNWpython-pyopenssl@0.7%2C5.11-0.96%3A20080829T151256Z' from 'http://pkg.opensolaris.org:80'
>> pkg:
>>
>> This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
>> problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
>> above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
>>
>> - twisti
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> indiana-discuss mailing list
>> indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


comay

Posts: 962
From: US

Registered: 3/9/05
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 5, 2008 2:05 AM   in response to: twisti

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

>> The OpenSolaris development package repository
>>
>> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
>>
>> has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_96 including major fixes
>> to the Caiman "Slim Install" and the Image Packaging System (IPS). In
>> addition, NetBeans 6.1 is now available in the repository.

> I get this error:
>
> root@workstation:~# pkg refresh
> root@workstation:~# pkg info -r SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95
> Name: SUNWipkg
> Summary:
> State: Not installed
> Authority: opensolaris.org (preferred)
> Version: 0.5.11
> Build Release: 5.11
> Branch: 0.95
> Packaging Date: Fri Aug 29 15:16:54 2008
> Size: 1.5 MB
> FMRI: pkg:/SUNWipkg@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080829T151654Z
> root@workstation:~# pkg install SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95
> Creating Plan -Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1734, in ?
> ret = main_func()
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1698, in main_func
> return install(img, pargs)
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 601, in install
> filters = filters, verbose = verbose, noexecute = noexecute)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 1704, in make_install_plan
> ip.evaluate()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 354, in evaluate
> self.evaluate_fmri(f)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 283, in evaluate_fmri
> self.evaluate_fmri(cf)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 206, in evaluate_fmri
> m = self.image.get_manifest(pfmri)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 554, in get_manifest
> m = self._fetch_manifest_with_retries(fmri)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 472, in _fetch_manifest_with_retries
> m = self._fetch_manifest(fmri)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 497, in _fetch_manifest
> mcontent = retrieve.get_manifest(self, fmri)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/retrieve.py", line 76, in get_manifest
> raise NameError, "could not retrieve manifest '%s' from '%s'" % \
> NameError: could not retrieve manifest 'SUNWpython-pyopenssl@0.7%2C5.11-0.96%3A20080829T151256Z' from 'http://pkg.opensolaris.org:80'
> pkg:
>
> This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
> problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
> above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.

Can you please provide the output of "pkg version"?

dsc
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


twisti

Posts: 74
From: AT

Registered: 5/27/08
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 5, 2008 2:26 AM   in response to: comay

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 02:05 -0700, David dot Comay at Sun dot COM wrote:
> Can you please provide the output of "pkg version"?

Sure:

$ pkg version
093ca22da67c

- twisti

_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


bandy

Posts: 353
From: RO

Registered: 2/16/07
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 5, 2008 2:27 AM   in response to: comay

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

093ca22da67c

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:05 PM, <David dot Comay at sun dot com> wrote:
>>> The OpenSolaris development package repository
>>>
>>> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
>>>
>>> has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_96 including major fixes
>>> to the Caiman "Slim Install" and the Image Packaging System (IPS). In
>>> addition, NetBeans 6.1 is now available in the repository.
>
>> I get this error:
>>
>> root@workstation:~# pkg refresh
>> root@workstation:~# pkg info -r SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95
>> Name: SUNWipkg
>> Summary:
>> State: Not installed
>> Authority: opensolaris.org (preferred)
>> Version: 0.5.11
>> Build Release: 5.11
>> Branch: 0.95
>> Packaging Date: Fri Aug 29 15:16:54 2008
>> Size: 1.5 MB
>> FMRI: pkg:/SUNWipkg@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080829T151654Z
>> root@workstation:~# pkg install SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95
>> Creating Plan -Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1734, in ?
>> ret = main_func()
>> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1698, in main_func
>> return install(img, pargs)
>> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 601, in install
>> filters = filters, verbose = verbose, noexecute = noexecute)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 1704, in make_install_plan
>> ip.evaluate()
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 354, in evaluate
>> self.evaluate_fmri(f)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 283, in evaluate_fmri
>> self.evaluate_fmri(cf)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 206, in evaluate_fmri
>> m = self.image.get_manifest(pfmri)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 554, in get_manifest
>> m = self._fetch_manifest_with_retries(fmri)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 472, in _fetch_manifest_with_retries
>> m = self._fetch_manifest(fmri)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 497, in _fetch_manifest
>> mcontent = retrieve.get_manifest(self, fmri)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/retrieve.py", line 76, in get_manifest
>> raise NameError, "could not retrieve manifest '%s' from '%s'" % \
>> NameError: could not retrieve manifest 'SUNWpython-pyopenssl@0.7%2C5.11-0.96%3A20080829T151256Z' from 'http://pkg.opensolaris.org:80'
>> pkg:
>>
>> This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
>> problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
>> above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
>
> Can you please provide the output of "pkg version"?
>
> dsc
> _______________________________________________
> indiana-discuss mailing list
> indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
>



--
Andy
http://blog.sartek.net
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


imavrouk

Posts: 81
From: GB

Registered: 6/3/08
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update bug
Posted: Sep 5, 2008 3:28 AM   in response to: bandy

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

Haven't noticed anyone reporting this issue yet.

DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER
(MB)
SUNWthunderbird 612/613 0/13
0.00/5.19 PHASE ACTIONS
Removal Phase 10399/10399
Install Phase 9091/9091
Update Phase 21074/95737 Action upgrade
failed for 'var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' (pkg:/SUNWcs):
OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path
name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS:
'/tmp/tmpvodwQc/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg:
An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 90] Number of
symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds
MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmpvodwQc/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made
to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted
at /tmp/tmpvodwQc should you wish to inspect it.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
ret = main_func()
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
return image_update(img, pargs)
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
img.imageplan.execute()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py",
line 615, in execute
p.execute_update(src, dest)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py", line
270, in execute_update
dest.install(self, src)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line
145, in install
os.chmod(temp, mode)
OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path
name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS:
'/tmp/tmpvodwQc/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg:

This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including
the
above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
-bash-3.2# pkg version
bfe78d71dc9a



Please, consider the environment before printing this e-mail.


_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


imavrouk

Posts: 81
From: GB

Registered: 6/3/08
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update bug
Posted: Sep 5, 2008 3:53 AM   in response to: imavrouk

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

Argh saw that this is...

inetd_generic.xml is a softlink onto itself..


Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
> Haven't noticed anyone reporting this issue yet.
>
> DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER
> (MB)
> SUNWthunderbird 612/613 0/13
> 0.00/5.19 PHASE ACTIONS
> Removal Phase 10399/10399
> Install Phase 9091/9091
> Update Phase 21074/95737 Action upgrade
> failed for 'var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' (pkg:/SUNWcs):
> OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path
> name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS:
> '/tmp/tmpvodwQc/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
> pkg:
> An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 90] Number of
> symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds
> MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmpvodwQc/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
> The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made
> to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted
> at /tmp/tmpvodwQc should you wish to inspect it.
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
> ret = main_func()
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
> return image_update(img, pargs)
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
> img.imageplan.execute()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py",
> line 615, in execute
> p.execute_update(src, dest)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py", line
> 270, in execute_update
> dest.install(self, src)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line
> 145, in install
> os.chmod(temp, mode)
> OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path
> name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS:
> '/tmp/tmpvodwQc/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
> pkg:
>
> This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
> problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including
> the
> above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
> -bash-3.2# pkg version
> bfe78d71dc9a
>
>
>
> Please, consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> indiana-discuss mailing list
> indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


milek

Posts: 698
From: GB

Registered: 4/27/05
Re: [indiana-discuss] [pkg-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update bug
Posted: Sep 7, 2008 5:34 AM   in response to: imavrouk

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

Hello Yiannis,

Friday, September 5, 2008, 11:53:49 AM, you wrote:

YM> Argh saw that this is...

YM> inetd_generic.xml is a softlink onto itself..


Still pkg should report a nice warning/error message in such a case.

--
Best regards,
Robert Milkowski mailto:milek at task dot gda dot pl
http://milek.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


dduvall

Posts: 1,253
From:

Registered: 3/9/05
Re: [indiana-discuss] [pkg-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 5, 2008 7:30 AM   in response to: comay

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

There was a hiccup yesterday where one of the mirrors didn't have all the
latest packages, but you could still get a catalog from one of the servers
that knew about all of them. See bug 3254. That's been fixed now, so if
that was your problem, then trying again should resolve the issue.

Thanks,
Danek
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


milek

Posts: 698
From: GB

Registered: 4/27/05
Re: [indiana-discuss] [pkg-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 7, 2008 5:26 AM   in response to: dduvall

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

Hello Danek,

Friday, September 5, 2008, 3:30:06 PM, you wrote:

DD> There was a hiccup yesterday where one of the mirrors didn't have all the
DD> latest packages, but you could still get a catalog from one of the servers
DD> that knew about all of them. See bug 3254. That's been fixed now, so if
DD> that was your problem, then trying again should resolve the issue.


Nevertheless IMHO pkg should provide nice error message instead of all
that python messages which end user won't understand.

--
Best regards,
Robert Milkowski mailto:milek at task dot gda dot pl
http://milek.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


Shawn Walker
swalker@opensolaris....
Re: [indiana-discuss] [pkg-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 7, 2008 2:13 PM   in response to: milek

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

Robert Milkowski wrote:
> Hello Danek,
>
> Friday, September 5, 2008, 3:30:06 PM, you wrote:
>
> DD> There was a hiccup yesterday where one of the mirrors didn't have all the
> DD> latest packages, but you could still get a catalog from one of the servers
> DD> that knew about all of them. See bug 3254. That's been fixed now, so if
> DD> that was your problem, then trying again should resolve the issue.
>
>
> Nevertheless IMHO pkg should provide nice error message instead of all
> that python messages which end user won't understand.

...and we agree with that. We have several long term bug entries open
about changing the client to provide more friendly responses.

--
Shawn Walker
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


calumb

Posts: 986
From: IE

Registered: 7/14/05
Re: [indiana-discuss] [pkg-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 7, 2008 3:38 PM   in response to: Shawn Walker

  Click to reply to this thread Reply


On 7 Sep 2008, at 22:13, Shawn Walker wrote:

> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>>
>> that python messages which end user won't understand.
>
> ...and we agree with that. We have several long term bug entries open
> about changing the client to provide more friendly responses.

Every time I read about software in this day and age where basic
interactions with the user are regarded as "stuff to fix later", my
hair turns a little more grey :) :(

Cheeri,
Calum.

--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:calum dot benson at sun dot com GNOME Desktop Team
http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771

Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems

_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


Shawn Walker
swalker@opensolaris....
Re: [indiana-discuss] [pkg-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 7, 2008 4:22 PM   in response to: calumb

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

Calum Benson wrote:
> On 7 Sep 2008, at 22:13, Shawn Walker wrote:
>
>> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>>> that python messages which end user won't understand.
>> ...and we agree with that. We have several long term bug entries open
>> about changing the client to provide more friendly responses.
>
> Every time I read about software in this day and age where basic
> interactions with the user are regarded as "stuff to fix later", my
> hair turns a little more grey :) :(

It is certainly our goal to implement friendly messages ahead of time
where possible. For errors we don't specifically handle, a generic
message is provided directing a user about what to do (contact us).

However, we still need the "unfriendly" messages when something
unexpected happens so we can help them figure out what went wrong.

As I'm sure you're aware, pkg(5) is still under heavy development, so
the spit and polish of a fully supported solution isn't yet in place.

Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


Al Slater
al.slater@scluk.com
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 5, 2008 6:20 AM   in response to: comay

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

This was the result I got from image-update

Al

aslate: /export/home/aslate> pfexec pkg image-update
Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
Completed 600/600 2570/2570 180.84/180.84

PHASE ACTIONS
Removal Phase 3465/3465
Install Phase 3434/3434
Update Phase 91350/91350
PHASE ITEMS
Reading Existing Index 8/8
Indexing Packages 1/600pkg:
An unexpected error happened during image-update:
'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z'
The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made
to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at
/tmp/tmpgeKBsw should you wish to inspect it.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
ret = main_func()
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
return image_update(img, pargs)
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
img.imageplan.execute()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py",
line 662, in execute
ind.client_update_index((self.filters, plan_info))
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 677, in
client_update_index
tmp_index_dir)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 638, in
_generic_update_index
start_point)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 316, in
_process_pkgplan_list
self._data_full_fmri.remove_entity(
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/search_storage.py", line
582, in remove_entity
self._set.remove(entity)
KeyError: 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z'
pkg:

This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.

aslate: /var/pkg/download> pkg version
bfe78d71dc9a


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkjBMiUACgkQz4fTOFL/EDboMACeN5/yVR0CpcLd5W9QvZ2YoDGJ
mfMAniZrqsGDLAiWY8ZxYS8IsDTbaaw7
=RQep
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


gkout

Posts: 23
From: GR

Registered: 7/15/05
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 5, 2008 3:18 PM   in response to: Al Slater
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
  Click to reply to this thread Reply

I tried to update one hour ago and got the same SUNWicdc error as Al Slater.

Message was edited by: gkout

herrib

Posts: 60
From: FR

Registered: 8/28/07
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 6, 2008 12:13 AM   in response to: gkout
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
  Click to reply to this thread Reply

Hello,

I've successfully upgraded my system, from svn_95 to svn_96, following the instructions which have been provided in the previous posts.

I summarize hereafter the procedure I followed:

* delete the existing /var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml and replace it by an empty file
* pfexec pkg refresh --full
* pfexec pkg image-update -v
* in case of trouble, beadm unmount -f opensolaris-X (the image which has been created) and then beadm destroy -f opensolaris-X
* reindex packages pkg build-index
* pfexec pkg image-update -v

Well, it can sound odd by any way but it finally worked ...

che

Posts: 476
From: AU

Registered: 6/14/05
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 6, 2008 7:17 PM   in response to: herrib
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
  Click to reply to this thread Reply

just a note that the pkg command is rebuild-index not build-index...

Brock Pytlik
bpytlik@sun.com
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 5, 2008 4:37 PM   in response to: Al Slater

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

Please try running pkg rebuild-index, then attempt your image update again.

Thanks,
Brock

Al Slater wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> This was the result I got from image-update
>
> Al
>
> aslate: /export/home/aslate> pfexec pkg image-update
> Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
> DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
> Completed 600/600 2570/2570 180.84/180.84
>
> PHASE ACTIONS
> Removal Phase 3465/3465
> Install Phase 3434/3434
> Update Phase 91350/91350
> PHASE ITEMS
> Reading Existing Index 8/8
> Indexing Packages 1/600pkg:
> An unexpected error happened during image-update:
> 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z'
> The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made
> to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at
> /tmp/tmpgeKBsw should you wish to inspect it.
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
> ret = main_func()
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
> return image_update(img, pargs)
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
> img.imageplan.execute()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py",
> line 662, in execute
> ind.client_update_index((self.filters, plan_info))
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 677, in
> client_update_index
> tmp_index_dir)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 638, in
> _generic_update_index
> start_point)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 316, in
> _process_pkgplan_list
> self._data_full_fmri.remove_entity(
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/search_storage.py", line
> 582, in remove_entity
> self._set.remove(entity)
> KeyError: 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z'
> pkg:
>
> This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
> problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
> above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
>
> aslate: /var/pkg/download> pkg version
> bfe78d71dc9a
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkjBMiUACgkQz4fTOFL/EDboMACeN5/yVR0CpcLd5W9QvZ2YoDGJ
> mfMAniZrqsGDLAiWY8ZxYS8IsDTbaaw7
> =RQep
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> indiana-discuss mailing list
> indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
>

_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


ormandj

Posts: 192
From:

Registered: 2/21/06
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 5, 2008 8:15 PM   in response to: Brock Pytlik

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

No Dice. See complete attempt, including the rebuild and so forth:

ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg image-update
Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
DOWNLOAD           & nbsp;            &nb sp;           PKGS       FILES     XFER (MB)
Completed           &nbs p;                     616/616     530/530     3.43/3.43

PHASE                         &n bsp;            &nbs p;  ACTIONS
Removal Phase            &n bsp;            &nbs p;    3514/3514
Install Phase            &n bsp;            &nbs p;    3462/3462
Update Phase            &n bsp;            &nbs p;   21273/91793 Action upgrade failed for 'var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' (pkg:/SUNWcs):
 OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmp58E_R4/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg:
An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmp58E_R4/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
 The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made to a clone of the running system.  This clone is mounted at /tmp/tmp58E_R4 should you wish to inspect it.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
    ret = main_func()
  File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
    return image_update(img, pargs)
  File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
    img.imageplan.execute()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 615, in execute
    p.execute_update(src, dest)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py", line 270, in execute_update
    dest.install(self, src)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line 145, in install
    os.chmod(temp, mode)
OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmp58E_R4/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg:

This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg rebuild-index
PHASE         &nb sp;              ;             & nbsp;     ITEMS
Indexing Packages             ;             & nbsp;  618/618
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec beadm list

BE            Active Active on Mountpoint     Space
Name             ;     reboot            & nbsp;      Used 
----          ------ --------- ----------     -----
opensolaris-1 no     no        -              94.25M
opensolaris-2 yes    yes       /              9.84G
opensolaris-3 no     no        /tmp/tmp58E_R4 224.74M
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec beadm unmount opensolaris-3
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec beadm destroy opensolaris-3
Are you sure you want to destroy opensolaris-3? This action cannot be undone (y/[n]):
y
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg image-update
Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
DOWNLOAD           & nbsp;            &nb sp;           PKGS       FILES     XFER (MB)
SUNWthunderbird          &nbs p;                615/616        0/13     0.00/5.19 PHASE            &n bsp;            &nbs p;              ACTIONS
Removal Phase            &n bsp;            &nbs p;    3514/3514
Install Phase            &n bsp;            &nbs p;    3462/3462
Update Phase            &n bsp;            &nbs p;   21282/91793 Action upgrade failed for 'var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' (pkg:/SUNWcs):
 OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmptZI__D/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg:
An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmptZI__D/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
 The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made to a clone of the running system.  This clone is mounted at /tmp/tmptZI__D should you wish to inspect it.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
    ret = main_func()
  File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
    return image_update(img, pargs)
  File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
    img.imageplan.execute()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 615, in execute
    p.execute_update(src, dest)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py", line 270, in execute_update
    dest.install(self, src)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line 145, in install
    os.chmod(temp, mode)
OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmptZI__D/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg:

This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Brock Pytlik <bpytlik at sun dot com> wrote:
Please try running pkg rebuild-index, then attempt your image update again.

Thanks,
Brock

Al Slater wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> This was the result I got from image-update
>
> Al
>
> aslate: /export/home/aslate> pfexec pkg image-update
> Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
> DOWNLOAD                                    PKGS       FILES     XFER (MB)
> Completed                                600/600   2570/2570 180.84/180.84
>
> PHASE                                        ACTIONS
> Removal Phase                              3465/3465
> Install Phase                              3434/3434
> Update Phase                             91350/91350
> PHASE                                          ITEMS
> Reading Existing Index                           8/8
> Indexing Packages                              1/600pkg:
> An unexpected error happened during image-update:
> 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z'
>  The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made
> to a clone of the running system.  This clone is mounted at
> /tmp/tmpgeKBsw should you wish to inspect it.
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
>     ret = main_func()
>   File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
>     return image_update(img, pargs)
>   File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
>     img.imageplan.execute()
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py",
> line 662, in execute
>     ind.client_update_index((self.filters, plan_info))
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 677, in
> client_update_index
>     tmp_index_dir)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 638, in
> _generic_update_index
>     start_point)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 316, in
> _process_pkgplan_list
>     self._data_full_fmri.remove_entity(
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/search_storage.py", line
> 582, in remove_entity
>     self._set.remove(entity)
> KeyError: 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z'
> pkg:
>
> This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
> problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
> above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
>
> aslate: /var/pkg/download> pkg version
> bfe78d71dc9a
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkjBMiUACgkQz4fTOFL/EDboMACeN5/yVR0CpcLd5W9QvZ2YoDGJ
> mfMAniZrqsGDLAiWY8ZxYS8IsDTbaaw7
> =RQep
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> indiana-discuss mailing list
> indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
>

_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

_______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


Brock Pytlik
bpytlik@sun.com
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 5, 2008 8:19 PM   in response to: ormandj

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

Yes, but this is a different problem.

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3262 is what you're now
encountering. Comments 5 and 8 in that bug report have the recommend
workarounds.

Brock

David Orman wrote:
> No Dice. See complete attempt, including the rebuild and so forth:
>
> ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg image-update
> Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
> DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
> Completed 616/616 530/530
> 3.43/3.43
>
> PHASE ACTIONS
> Removal Phase 3514/3514
> Install Phase 3462/3462
> Update Phase 21273/91793 Action upgrade
> failed for 'var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' (pkg:/SUNWcs):
> OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path
> name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS:
> '/tmp/tmp58E_R4/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
> pkg:
> An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 90] Number of
> symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds
> MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmp58E_R4/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
> The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only
> made to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at
> /tmp/tmp58E_R4 should you wish to inspect it.
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
> ret = main_func()
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
> return image_update(img, pargs)
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
> img.imageplan.execute()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py",
> line 615, in execute
> p.execute_update(src, dest)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py",
> line 270, in execute_update
> dest.install(self, src)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line
> 145, in install
> os.chmod(temp, mode)
> OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path
> name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS:
> '/tmp/tmp58E_R4/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
> pkg:
>
> This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
> problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
> above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
> ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg rebuild-index
> PHASE ITEMS
> Indexing Packages 618/618
> ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec beadm list
>
> BE Active Active on Mountpoint Space
> Name reboot Used
> ---- ------ --------- ---------- -----
> opensolaris-1 no no - 94.25M
> opensolaris-2 yes yes / 9.84G
> opensolaris-3 no no /tmp/tmp58E_R4 224.74M
> ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec beadm unmount opensolaris-3
> ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec beadm destroy opensolaris-3
> Are you sure you want to destroy opensolaris-3? This action cannot be
> undone (y/[n]):
> y
> ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg image-update
> Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
> DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
> SUNWthunderbird 615/616 0/13
> 0.00/5.19 PHASE ACTIONS
> Removal Phase 3514/3514
> Install Phase 3462/3462
> Update Phase 21282/91793 Action upgrade
> failed for 'var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' (pkg:/SUNWcs):
> OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path
> name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS:
> '/tmp/tmptZI__D/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
> pkg:
> An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 90] Number of
> symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds
> MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmptZI__D/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
> The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only
> made to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at
> /tmp/tmptZI__D should you wish to inspect it.
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
> ret = main_func()
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
> return image_update(img, pargs)
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
> img.imageplan.execute()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py",
> line 615, in execute
> p.execute_update(src, dest)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py",
> line 270, in execute_update
> dest.install(self, src)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line
> 145, in install
> os.chmod(temp, mode)
> OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path
> name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS:
> '/tmp/tmptZI__D/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
> pkg:
>
> This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
> problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
> above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
> ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Brock Pytlik <bpytlik at sun dot com
> <mailto:bpytlik at sun dot com>> wrote:
>
> Please try running pkg rebuild-index, then attempt your image
> update again.
>
> Thanks,
> Brock
>
> Al Slater wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > This was the result I got from image-update
> >
> > Al
> >
> > aslate: /export/home/aslate> pfexec pkg image-update
> > Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
> > DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES
> XFER (MB)
> > Completed 600/600 2570/2570
> 180.84/180.84
> >
> > PHASE ACTIONS
> > Removal Phase 3465/3465
> > Install Phase 3434/3434
> > Update Phase 91350/91350
> > PHASE ITEMS
> > Reading Existing Index 8/8
> > Indexing Packages 1/600pkg:
> > An unexpected error happened during image-update:
> > 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z'
> > The running system has not been modified. Modifications were
> only made
> > to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at
> > /tmp/tmpgeKBsw should you wish to inspect it.
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
> > ret = main_func()
> > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
> > return image_update(img, pargs)
> > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
> > img.imageplan.execute()
> > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py",
> > line 662, in execute
> > ind.client_update_index((self.filters, plan_info))
> > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line
> 677, in
> > client_update_index
> > tmp_index_dir)
> > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line
> 638, in
> > _generic_update_index
> > start_point)
> > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line
> 316, in
> > _process_pkgplan_list
> > self._data_full_fmri.remove_entity(
> > File
> "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/search_storage.py", line
> > 582, in remove_entity
> > self._set.remove(entity)
> > KeyError: 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z'
> > pkg:
> >
> > This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
> > problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and
> including the
> > above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
> >
> > aslate: /var/pkg/download> pkg version
> > bfe78d71dc9a
> >
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> >
> > iEYEARECAAYFAkjBMiUACgkQz4fTOFL/EDboMACeN5/yVR0CpcLd5W9QvZ2YoDGJ
> > mfMAniZrqsGDLAiWY8ZxYS8IsDTbaaw7
> > =RQep
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > indiana-discuss mailing list
> > indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
> <mailto:indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org>
> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> indiana-discuss mailing list
> indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
> <mailto:indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org>
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
>
>

_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


ormandj

Posts: 192
From:

Registered: 2/21/06
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 5, 2008 9:43 PM   in response to: Brock Pytlik

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

This worked, thank you.

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Brock Pytlik <bpytlik at sun dot com> wrote:
Yes, but this is a different problem.

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3262 is what you're now encountering. Comments 5 and 8 in that bug report have the recommend workarounds.

Brock

David Orman wrote:
No Dice. See complete attempt, including the rebuild and so forth:

ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg image-update
Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
DOWNLOAD                                    PKGS       FILES     XFER (MB)
Completed                                616/616     530/530     3.43/3.43

PHASE                                        ACTIONS
Removal Phase                              3514/3514
Install Phase                              3462/3462
Update Phase                             21273/91793 Action upgrade failed for 'var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' (pkg:/SUNWcs):
 OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmp58E_R4/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg:
An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmp58E_R4/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
 The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made to a clone of the running system.  This clone is mounted at /tmp/tmp58E_R4 should you wish to inspect it.
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
   ret = main_func()
 File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
   return image_update(img, pargs)
 File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
   img.imageplan.execute()
 File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 615, in execute
   p.execute_update(src, dest)
 File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py", line 270, in execute_update
   dest.install(self, src)
 File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line 145, in install
   os.chmod(temp, mode)
OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmp58E_R4/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg:

This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg rebuild-index
PHASE                                          ITEMS
Indexing Packages                            618/618
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec beadm list

BE            Active Active on Mountpoint     Space
Name                 reboot                   Used ----          ------ --------- ----------     -----
opensolaris-1 no     no        -              94.25M
opensolaris-2 yes    yes       /              9.84G
opensolaris-3 no     no        /tmp/tmp58E_R4 224.74M
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec beadm unmount opensolaris-3
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec beadm destroy opensolaris-3
Are you sure you want to destroy opensolaris-3? This action cannot be undone (y/[n]):
y
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg image-update
Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
DOWNLOAD                                    PKGS       FILES     XFER (MB)
SUNWthunderbird                          615/616        0/13     0.00/5.19 PHASE                                        ACTIONS
Removal Phase                              3514/3514
Install Phase                              3462/3462
Update Phase                             21282/91793 Action upgrade failed for 'var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' (pkg:/SUNWcs):
 OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmptZI__D/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg:
An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmptZI__D/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
 The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made to a clone of the running system.  This clone is mounted at /tmp/tmptZI__D should you wish to inspect it.
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
   ret = main_func()
 File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
   return image_update(img, pargs)
 File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
   img.imageplan.execute()
 File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 615, in execute
   p.execute_update(src, dest)
 File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py", line 270, in execute_update
   dest.install(self, src)
 File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line 145, in install
   os.chmod(temp, mode)
OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmptZI__D/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg:

This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Brock Pytlik <bpytlik at sun dot com <mailto:bpytlik at sun dot com>> wrote:

   Please try running pkg rebuild-index, then attempt your image
   update again.

   Thanks,
   Brock

   Al Slater wrote:
   > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
   > Hash: SHA1
   >
   > This was the result I got from image-update
   >
   > Al
   >
   > aslate: /export/home/aslate> pfexec pkg image-update
   > Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
   > DOWNLOAD                                    PKGS       FILES        XFER (MB)
   > Completed                                600/600   2570/2570
   180.84/180.84
   >
   > PHASE                                        ACTIONS
   > Removal Phase                              3465/3465
   > Install Phase                              3434/3434
   > Update Phase                             91350/91350
   > PHASE                                          ITEMS
   > Reading Existing Index                           8/8
   > Indexing Packages                              1/600pkg:
   > An unexpected error happened during image-update:
   > 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z'
   >  The running system has not been modified. Modifications were
   only made
   > to a clone of the running system.  This clone is mounted at
   > /tmp/tmpgeKBsw should you wish to inspect it.
   > Traceback (most recent call last):
   >   File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
   >     ret = main_func()
   >   File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
   >     return image_update(img, pargs)
   >   File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
   >     img.imageplan.execute()
   >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py",
   > line 662, in execute
   >     ind.client_update_index((self.filters, plan_info))
   >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line
   677, in
   > client_update_index
   >     tmp_index_dir)
   >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line
   638, in
   > _generic_update_index
   >     start_point)
   >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line
   316, in
   > _process_pkgplan_list
   >     self._data_full_fmri.remove_entity(
   >   File
   "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/search_storage.py", line
   > 582, in remove_entity
   >     self._set.remove(entity)
   > KeyError: 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z'
   > pkg:
   >
   > This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
   > problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and
   including the
   > above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
   >
   > aslate: /var/pkg/download> pkg version
   > bfe78d71dc9a
   >
   >
   > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
   > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS)
   > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
   >
   > iEYEARECAAYFAkjBMiUACgkQz4fTOFL/EDboMACeN5/yVR0CpcLd5W9QvZ2YoDGJ
   > mfMAniZrqsGDLAiWY8ZxYS8IsDTbaaw7
   > =RQep
   > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
   >
   > _______________________________________________
   > indiana-discuss mailing list
   > indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
   <mailto:indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org>

   > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
   >

   _______________________________________________
   indiana-discuss mailing list
   indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
   <mailto:indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org>


_______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


Al Slater
al.slater@scluk.com
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted: Sep 6, 2008 1:57 AM   in response to: Brock Pytlik

  Click to reply to this thread Reply

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Brock Pytlik wrote:
> Please try running pkg rebuild-index, then attempt your image update again.

Yep, that fixed it. Thanks.

> Al Slater wrote:
> This was the result I got from image-update
>
> Al
>
> aslate: /export/home/aslate> pfexec pkg image-update
> Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
> DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
> Completed 600/600 2570/2570 180.84/180.84
>
> PHASE ACTIONS
> Removal Phase 3465/3465
> Install Phase 3434/3434
> Update Phase 91350/91350
> PHASE ITEMS
> Reading Existing Index 8/8
> Indexing Packages 1/600pkg:
> An unexpected error happened during image-update:
> 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z'
> The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made
> to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at
> /tmp/tmpgeKBsw should you wish to inspect it.
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
> ret = main_func()
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
> return image_update(img, pargs)
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
> img.imageplan.execute()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py",
> line 662, in execute
> ind.client_update_index((self.filters, plan_info))
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 677, in
> client_update_index
> tmp_index_dir)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 638, in
> _generic_update_index
> start_point)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 316, in
> _process_pkgplan_list
> self._data_full_fmri.remove_entity(
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/search_storage.py", line
> 582, in remove_entity
> self._set.remove(entity)
> KeyError: 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z'
> pkg:
>
> This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
> problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
> above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
>
> aslate: /var/pkg/download> pkg version
> bfe78d71dc9a
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkjCRfYACgkQz4fTOFL/EDYWggCdHImUHlEPOF1fbZQ2aLGnW/5S
yo4AnjIVC1mtOwkYfyG5/C/z3ef14PZf
=xLfX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


joschang

Posts: 45
From:

Registered: 3/24/08
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
Posted: Sep 6, 2008 9:19 PM   in response to: comay
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
  Click to reply to this thread Reply

Hi, I tried to update and I got the following error:

-bash-3.2$ pfexec pkg image-update
Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
SUNWthunderbird 640/641 0/13 0.00/5.19 PHASE ACTIONS
Removal Phase 10491/10491
Install Phase 9161/9161
Update Phase 65062/126123 Action upgrade failed for 'kernel/drv/bnx.conf' (pkg:/BRCMbnx):
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
pkg:
An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at /tmp/tmpYwzZCn should you wish to inspect it.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
ret = main_func()
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
return image_update(img, pargs)
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
img.imageplan.execute()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 615, in execute
p.execute_update(src, dest)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py", line 270, in execute_update
dest.install(self, src)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line 166, in install
portable.rename(temp, final_path)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/portable/os_unix.py", line 169, in rename
os.rename(src, dst)
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
pkg:

This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
-bash-3.2$ pkg version
bfe78d71dc9a

waynel

Posts: 2,177
From: US

Registered: 6/24/05
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
Posted: Sep 7, 2008 10:54 AM   in response to: joschang
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
  Click to reply to this thread Reply

I was able to image-update to b96 in one machine (from B91), but have no luck in two other machines with different update histories.

Running out of patience, I installed the B96 LiveDVD in one of the machines, but it introduced other problems (relating to Java and OpenOffice.org, etc.)

It appears that something is terribly broken. I think we are getting close to the 2008.11 release date, lots of activities are going on and thus lots of regressions. Coming from the Linux world, this is totally normal.

My advice is, if you have problems updating to B96, don't be frustrated, and, more importantly, don't force it. Be patient and boot back to the previous BE. Thanks to ZFS, back-booting is a painless process.

andrewk8

Posts: 595
From:

Registered: 3/12/08
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
Posted: Sep 7, 2008 4:03 PM   in response to: waynel
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
  Click to reply to this thread Reply

@waynel: if the problem is the same as above - i.e. the error with inetd_generic.xml - then this is due to a bug in build 95. If you skip build 95, you should be OK. The workaround is detailed in this forum thread on opensolaris.org (not sure if your on the mailing list) and here:

http://sites.google.com/site/solarium/how-to-update-opensolaris

Cheers

Andrew.

waynel

Posts: 2,177
From: US

Registered: 6/24/05
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
Posted: Sep 7, 2008 5:24 PM   in response to: andrewk8
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
  Click to reply to this thread Reply

> @waynel: if the problem is the same as above - i.e.
> the error with inetd_generic.xml - then this is due
> to a bug in build 95. If you skip build 95, you
> should be OK. The workaround is detailed in this
> forum thread on opensolaris.org (not sure if your on
> the mailing list) and here:
>
> http://sites.google.com/site/solarium/how-to-update-op
> ensolaris
>
> Cheers
>
> Andrew.

Thanks, Andrew.

Yes, I was able to overcome this problem and image-update to b96. But thereafter I was not able to boot, and had to go back to b95.

In another machine, I was not able to do the "pkg install SUNWipkg" and did the stupid thing of uninstalling it--and the rest is history.

I think there are a myriad of problems with IPS, which is currently going thru an accelerated genesis. Of course we have an obligation to go thru each build, but make sure that we are not doing that on our primary machines.

andrewk8

Posts: 595
From:

Registered: 3/12/08
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
Posted: Sep 8, 2008 5:23 AM   in response to: waynel
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
  Click to reply to this thread Reply

> Yes, I was able to overcome this problem and
> image-update to b96. But thereafter I was not able
> to boot, and had to go back to b95.

Were you able to boot the original Boot Environment for build 95?

Thanks

Andrew.

waynel

Posts: 2,177
From: US

Registered: 6/24/05
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
Posted: Sep 8, 2008 9:24 AM   in response to: andrewk8
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
  Click to reply to this thread Reply

> > Yes, I was able to overcome this problem and
> > image-update to b96. But thereafter I was not
> able
> > to boot, and had to go back to b95.
>
> Were you able to boot the original Boot Environment
> for build 95?
>
> Thanks
>
> Andrew.

Yes. (Why are you asking?)

andrewk8

Posts: 595
From:

Registered: 3/12/08
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
Posted: Sep 9, 2008 3:43 AM   in response to: waynel
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
  Click to reply to this thread Reply

> > Were you able to boot the original Boot
> Environment
> > for build 95?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Andrew.
>
> Yes. (Why are you asking?)

Because if it is trashing your old BE then this is a bigger problem, and should be reported to the appropriate team. Luckily that wasn't the case. :-)

Cheers

Andrew.




Terms of Use | Privacy | Trademarks | Copyright Policy | Site Guidelines
Your use of this web site or any of its content or software indicates your agreement to be bound by these Terms of Use.
Copyright © 1995-2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc.