|
Replies:
31
-
Last Post:
Sep 9, 2008 3:43 AM
by: andrewk8
|
|
|
Posts:
962
From:
US
Registered:
3/9/05
|
|
|
|
[indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
(build 96)
Posted:
Sep 4, 2008 1:46 PM
|
|
The OpenSolaris development package repository
http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_96 including major fixes to the Caiman "Slim Install" and the Image Packaging System (IPS). In addition, NetBeans 6.1 is now available in the repository.
Users who wish to update their system to the development build can do so using the "image-update" facility provided by the pkg(1) command. For important information about "image-update", see the instructions at
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/rn3/image-update/
IMPORTANT NOTE: The development builds have undergone limited testing and users should expect to uncover issues as the next release is developed.
ISO images are being made available for this build via BitTorrent. Torrent files are provided as follows
Primary Languages, gzip compression, 738MB http://dlc.sun.com/torrents/info/osol-0811-96.iso.torrent (if burned to media, image should be burned to a DVD)
All Languages, LZMA compression, 656MB http://dlc.sun.com/torrents/info/osol-0811-96-global.iso.torrent (if burned to media, image can be burned to a CD)
MD5 checksums for these images http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/files/md5sums_96.txt
New packages in this repository update ====================================== SUNWgsed gsed - GNU implementation of sed, the Unix SUNWlibdatrie libdatrie SUNWlibgsf GNOME Structured File Library SUNWlibthai libthai SUNWscim Smart Common Input Method Framework SUNWscim-anthy Smart Common Input Method Framework - libanthy SUNWscim-chewing Smart Common Input Method Framework SUNWscim-hangul Smart Common Input Method Framework - libhangul SUNWscim-pinyin Smart Common Input Method Framework - Smart SUNWscim-sunpinyin Smart Common Input Method Framework - SunPinyin SUNWscim-tables Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable SUNWscim-tables-chinese Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable SUNWscim-tables-extra Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable SUNWscim-tables-india Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable SUNWscim-tables-japanese Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable SUNWscim-tables-korean Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable SUNWscim-thai Smart Common Input Method Framework - libthai SUNWw3m Desktop search tool - support libraries
Known issues in this repository update ====================================== 6733880 6677411/6677801/PSARC/2008/342 broke VirtualBox by polluting its http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6733880
When starting up, VirtualBox terminates prematurely with the following message reported
ERROR: 0 bytes read from child process
Work-around:
Set the environment variable LD_NODIRECT to 1 prior to executing VirtualBox
$ LD_NODIRECT=1 VirtualBox
3050 swap should be mandatory on systems with less than 1GB memory http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3050
On systems or virtual machines with 768MB or less of memory, the installer can hang.
Work-around:
In the case of a virtual machine, allocate 1GB during the installation phase. Otherwise, provide at least the amount of disk space recommended by the installer so that a swap volume will be created.
3200 "Malformed URL: None" when mirrors attribute on an authority is None http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3200
Systems that were originally installed with Developer Preview 2 can fail to "pkg image-update" with the following message reported
ValueError: Malformed URL: None
Work-around:
Edit the file /var/pkg/cfg_cache and change any lines of the form
mirrors = None
to instead read
mirrors = []
3214 additional NetBeans 6.1 dependencies needed http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
On systems that have installed a subset of NetBeans 6.1 packages including SUNWnetbeans-ruby and/or SUNWnetbeans-javaee, executing the IDE may report certain modules as being missing.
Work-around:
Manually install the dependent SUNWlibnb-gsf1 package
$ pfexec pkg install SUNWlibnb-gsf1
Image Packaging System (IPS) specific bugs addressed in this repository update ============================================================================= = 45 "move" action for files that are renamed, but must be preserved 590 actions should be evaluated across entire image transformation 1018 actions with payloads should include all sizes and hashes 1461 depot should ignore requests for absent files 1730 package containing space in name handled incorrectly 1905 GUI package manager slow responsiveness 2227 File action should verify its checksums 2261 Support mirroring of package content 2285 Versions lists unavailable operations 2309 pkg.depotd fails when -d argument is a relative pathname 2330 Imageconfig incorrectly parses boolean config options 2333 control over access / error log destination desired 2402 pkg unable to remove executable file that is in use on Windows 2415 EPERM on Windows when updating a file in use 2542 Make User-agent value deal with newer Windows versions 2556 client should measure download progress by compressed size 2732 Unable to publish large file on Windows XP 2735 pylint shows up various errors in the pkg code that need to be fixed. 2778 Need a way of adding the same commands to every package 2779 It would be handy to confine chatrr_glob to a single type 2790 The GUI should check if there is newer SUNWipkg and SUNWipkg-gui before 2795 two versions of a package can be installed 2818 We should include pyOpenSSL in the gate 2838 pkg image-update to b95 died while updating indexes 2840 SUNWipkg-gui-l10n has incorrect group for many directories 2852 resync repository to snv_96 2855 pkg.depotd --readonly won't serve search 2884 Need Netbeans 6.1 packages in repo 2889 gui doesn't update search indices 2890 IPS's SUNWkdc does not have correct package dependencies 2892 SUNWpython-cherrypy package should only include "core" files 2893 Upgrading to Snv_95 failed by IPS GUI 2905 pkg.depotd should gracefully handle bad manifest requests 2907 provide linux distro name in user-agent 2931 RSS/Atom feed has validation errors 2935 pkg.depotd traceback when unsupported operation version requested 2939 SUNWfreetype2 didn't actually go to 2.3.7 in build 96 2940 pyOpenSSL tarball and directory need to be in .hgignore 2951 Client should check if its SSL certificates have expired 2955 rebuild-index causes uninstall of pkg to fail after pkg's authority is 2971 putback of 2261 broke info operation 2986 test suite outputs failure messages from cli test subprocesses instead of 2988 FileList should use pkg.csize when possible 2990 test_contents_2 needs to sort lines 3054 logfiles not properly closed during test suite execution 3057 Need to include pyopenssl in clusters for build 96 3084 updating missing files tracebacks when trying to chmod 3091 importer fails after fix for bug 3057 3099 download cache must purge invalid contents 3127 backpublished SUNWipkg needs to depend on pyopenssl 3129 need to fold SUNWipkg-gui-l10n into SUNWipkg-gui 3158 SUNWnetbeans-javase is missing a dependency
Caiman installer specific bugs addressed in this repository update ================================================================== 1023 be_change_grub_default doesn't remove the temporary file when no boot 1049 beadm list -ds output could have a lot less Header information 1979 libbe: be_activate needs to run installgrub 2161 installer should be compliant with "ZFS root" design specification 2196 libbe should support non-legacy mounted zfs roots 2577 "beadm umount" should be an alias for "beadm unmount" 2843 libbe: destroying a BE should always destroy the snapshot used to create 2866 transfer module cpio functionality should allow cpio args to be passed in 2867 transfer module should allow ips set-authority to specify the preferred 2868 transfer module ips_retrieve should not modify cfg_cache 2887 beadm list space used totals for BE not intuitive 2891 beadm destroy has an annoying commandline 2918 transfer module - log_progress can write to the wrong 2943 be_init() fails to create new BE on Sparc platform 2949 Define white space and menu.lst location in header file and suppress 2963 beadm rename a BE to an existing BE will result in core dump 3009 slim_source gate fails to build on 96 _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
Posts:
192
From:
Registered:
2/21/06
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
(build 96)
Posted:
Sep 4, 2008 9:46 PM
in response to: comay
|
|
Error updating b95 -> b96: ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg image-update Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date... DOWNLOAD & nbsp; &nb sp; PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
Completed &nbs p; 616/616 3890/3890 613.78/613.78 PHASE &n bsp; &nbs p; ACTIONS Removal Phase &n bsp; &nbs p; 3509/3509 Update Phase &n bsp; &nbs p; 13012/91994 Action upgrade failed for 'var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' (pkg:/SUNWcs):
OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmpF1VYgA/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' pkg: An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmpF1VYgA/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at /tmp/tmpF1VYgA should you wish to inspect it. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1734, in ?
ret = main_func() File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1696, in main_func return image_update(img, pargs) File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 527, in image_update img.imageplan.execute() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 499, in execute
p.execute_update(src, dest) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py", line 292, in execute_update dest.install(self, src) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line 115, in install
os.chmod(temp, mode) OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmpF1VYgA/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' pkg: This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'. ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ uname -a
SunOS opensolaris-ormandj 5.11 snv_95 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ Should I file a bug, as it suggests, or am I missing something? I've not yet re-tried the operation. Cheers,
David On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:46 PM, <David dot Comay at sun dot com> wrote:
The OpenSolaris development package repository
http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_96 including major fixes
to the Caiman "Slim Install" and the Image Packaging System (IPS). In
addition, NetBeans 6.1 is now available in the repository.
Users who wish to update their system to the development build can do
so using the "image-update" facility provided by the pkg(1) command.
For important information about "image-update", see the instructions at
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/rn3/image-update/
IMPORTANT NOTE: The development builds have undergone limited testing
and users should expect to uncover issues as the next release is
developed.
ISO images are being made available for this build via BitTorrent.
Torrent files are provided as follows
Primary Languages, gzip compression, 738MB
http://dlc.sun.com/torrents/info/osol-0811-96.iso.torrent
(if burned to media, image should be burned to a DVD)
All Languages, LZMA compression, 656MB
http://dlc.sun.com/torrents/info/osol-0811-96-global.iso.torrent
(if burned to media, image can be burned to a CD)
MD5 checksums for these images
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/files/md5sums_96.txt
New packages in this repository update
======================================
SUNWgsed gsed - GNU implementation of sed, the Unix
SUNWlibdatrie libdatrie
SUNWlibgsf GNOME Structured File Library
SUNWlibthai libthai
SUNWscim Smart Common Input Method Framework
SUNWscim-anthy Smart Common Input Method Framework - libanthy
SUNWscim-chewing Smart Common Input Method Framework
SUNWscim-hangul Smart Common Input Method Framework - libhangul
SUNWscim-pinyin Smart Common Input Method Framework - Smart
SUNWscim-sunpinyin Smart Common Input Method Framework - SunPinyin
SUNWscim-tables Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable
SUNWscim-tables-chinese Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable
SUNWscim-tables-extra Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable
SUNWscim-tables-india Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable
SUNWscim-tables-japanese Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable
SUNWscim-tables-korean Smart Common Input Method Framework - Codetable
SUNWscim-thai Smart Common Input Method Framework - libthai
SUNWw3m Desktop search tool - support libraries
Known issues in this repository update
======================================
6733880 6677411/6677801/PSARC/2008/342 broke VirtualBox by polluting its
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6733880
When starting up, VirtualBox terminates prematurely with the
following message reported
ERROR: 0 bytes read from child process
Work-around:
Set the environment variable LD_NODIRECT to 1 prior to
executing VirtualBox
$ LD_NODIRECT=1 VirtualBox
3050 swap should be mandatory on systems with less than 1GB memory
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3050
On systems or virtual machines with 768MB or less of memory,
the installer can hang.
Work-around:
In the case of a virtual machine, allocate 1GB during
the installation phase. Otherwise, provide at least
the amount of disk space recommended by the installer
so that a swap volume will be created.
3200 "Malformed URL: None" when mirrors attribute on an authority is None
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3200
Systems that were originally installed with Developer Preview 2
can fail to "pkg image-update" with the following message
reported
ValueError: Malformed URL: None
Work-around:
Edit the file /var/pkg/cfg_cache and change any lines
of the form
mirrors = None
to instead read
mirrors = []
3214 additional NetBeans 6.1 dependencies needed
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
On systems that have installed a subset of NetBeans 6.1
packages including SUNWnetbeans-ruby and/or
SUNWnetbeans-javaee, executing the IDE may report certain
modules as being missing.
Work-around:
Manually install the dependent SUNWlibnb-gsf1 package
$ pfexec pkg install SUNWlibnb-gsf1
Image Packaging System (IPS) specific bugs addressed in this repository update
==============================================================================< br>
45 "move" action for files that are renamed, but must be preserved
590 actions should be evaluated across entire image transformation
1018 actions with payloads should include all sizes and hashes
1461 depot should ignore requests for absent files
1730 package containing space in name handled incorrectly
1905 GUI package manager slow responsiveness
2227 File action should verify its checksums
2261 Support mirroring of package content
2285 Versions lists unavailable operations
2309 pkg.depotd fails when -d argument is a relative pathname
2330 Imageconfig incorrectly parses boolean config options
2333 control over access / error log destination desired
2402 pkg unable to remove executable file that is in use on Windows
2415 EPERM on Windows when updating a file in use
2542 Make User-agent value deal with newer Windows versions
2556 client should measure download progress by compressed size
2732 Unable to publish large file on Windows XP
2735 pylint shows up various errors in the pkg code that need to be fixed.
2778 Need a way of adding the same commands to every package
2779 It would be handy to confine chatrr_glob to a single type
2790 The GUI should check if there is newer SUNWipkg and SUNWipkg-gui before
2795 two versions of a package can be installed
2818 We should include pyOpenSSL in the gate
2838 pkg image-update to b95 died while updating indexes
2840 SUNWipkg-gui-l10n has incorrect group for many directories
2852 resync repository to snv_96
2855 pkg.depotd --readonly won't serve search
2884 Need Netbeans 6.1 packages in repo
2889 gui doesn't update search indices
2890 IPS's SUNWkdc does not have correct package dependencies
2892 SUNWpython-cherrypy package should only include "core" files
2893 Upgrading to Snv_95 failed by IPS GUI
2905 pkg.depotd should gracefully handle bad manifest requests
2907 provide linux distro name in user-agent
2931 RSS/Atom feed has validation errors
2935 pkg.depotd traceback when unsupported operation version requested
2939 SUNWfreetype2 didn't actually go to 2.3.7 in build 96
2940 pyOpenSSL tarball and directory need to be in .hgignore
2951 Client should check if its SSL certificates have expired
2955 rebuild-index causes uninstall of pkg to fail after pkg's authority is
2971 putback of 2261 broke info operation
2986 test suite outputs failure messages from cli test subprocesses instead of
2988 FileList should use pkg.csize when possible
2990 test_contents_2 needs to sort lines
3054 logfiles not properly closed during test suite execution
3057 Need to include pyopenssl in clusters for build 96
3084 updating missing files tracebacks when trying to chmod
3091 importer fails after fix for bug 3057
3099 download cache must purge invalid contents
3127 backpublished SUNWipkg needs to depend on pyopenssl
3129 need to fold SUNWipkg-gui-l10n into SUNWipkg-gui
3158 SUNWnetbeans-javase is missing a dependency
Caiman installer specific bugs addressed in this repository update
==================================================================
1023 be_change_grub_default doesn't remove the temporary file when no boot
1049 beadm list -ds output could have a lot less Header information
1979 libbe: be_activate needs to run installgrub
2161 installer should be compliant with "ZFS root" design specification
2196 libbe should support non-legacy mounted zfs roots
2577 "beadm umount" should be an alias for "beadm unmount"
2843 libbe: destroying a BE should always destroy the snapshot used to create
2866 transfer module cpio functionality should allow cpio args to be passed in
2867 transfer module should allow ips set-authority to specify the preferred
2868 transfer module ips_retrieve should not modify cfg_cache
2887 beadm list space used totals for BE not intuitive
2891 beadm destroy has an annoying commandline
2918 transfer module - log_progress can write to the wrong
2943 be_init() fails to create new BE on Sparc platform
2949 Define white space and menu.lst location in header file and suppress
2963 beadm rename a BE to an existing BE will result in core dump
3009 slim_source gate fails to build on 96
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Posts:
74
From:
AT
Registered:
5/27/08
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
(build 96)
Posted:
Sep 5, 2008 12:33 AM
in response to: comay
|
|
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 13:46 -0700, David dot Comay at Sun dot COM wrote: > The OpenSolaris development package repository > > http://pkg.opensolaris.org/ > > has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_96 including major fixes > to the Caiman "Slim Install" and the Image Packaging System (IPS). In > addition, NetBeans 6.1 is now available in the repository.
I get this error:
root@workstation:~# pkg refresh root@workstation:~# pkg info -r SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95 Name: SUNWipkg Summary: State: Not installed Authority: opensolaris.org (preferred) Version: 0.5.11 Build Release: 5.11 Branch: 0.95 Packaging Date: Fri Aug 29 15:16:54 2008 Size: 1.5 MB FMRI: pkg:/SUNWipkg@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080829T151654Z root@workstation:~# pkg install SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95 Creating Plan -Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1734, in ? ret = main_func() File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1698, in main_func return install(img, pargs) File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 601, in install filters = filters, verbose = verbose, noexecute = noexecute) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 1704, in make_install_plan ip.evaluate() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 354, in evaluate self.evaluate_fmri(f) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 283, in evaluate_fmri self.evaluate_fmri(cf) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 206, in evaluate_fmri m = self.image.get_manifest(pfmri) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 554, in get_manifest m = self._fetch_manifest_with_retries(fmri) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 472, in _fetch_manifest_with_retries m = self._fetch_manifest(fmri) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 497, in _fetch_manifest mcontent = retrieve.get_manifest(self, fmri) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/retrieve.py", line 76, in get_manifest raise NameError, "could not retrieve manifest '%s' from '%s'" % \ NameError: could not retrieve manifest 'SUNWpython-pyopenssl@0.7%2C5.11-0.96%3A20080829T151256Z' from 'http://pkg.opensolaris.org:80' pkg:
This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
- twisti
_______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Posts:
353
From:
RO
Registered:
2/16/07
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
(build 96)
Posted:
Sep 5, 2008 12:34 AM
in response to: twisti
|
|
same here
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Christian Thalinger <twisti at complang dot tuwien dot ac dot at> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 13:46 -0700, David dot Comay at Sun dot COM wrote: >> The OpenSolaris development package repository >> >> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/ >> >> has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_96 including major fixes >> to the Caiman "Slim Install" and the Image Packaging System (IPS). In >> addition, NetBeans 6.1 is now available in the repository. > > I get this error: > > root@workstation:~# pkg refresh > root@workstation:~# pkg info -r SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95 > Name: SUNWipkg > Summary: > State: Not installed > Authority: opensolaris.org (preferred) > Version: 0.5.11 > Build Release: 5.11 > Branch: 0.95 > Packaging Date: Fri Aug 29 15:16:54 2008 > Size: 1.5 MB > FMRI: pkg:/SUNWipkg@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080829T151654Z > root@workstation:~# pkg install SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95 > Creating Plan -Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1734, in ? > ret = main_func() > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1698, in main_func > return install(img, pargs) > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 601, in install > filters = filters, verbose = verbose, noexecute = noexecute) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 1704, in make_install_plan > ip.evaluate() > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 354, in evaluate > self.evaluate_fmri(f) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 283, in evaluate_fmri > self.evaluate_fmri(cf) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 206, in evaluate_fmri > m = self.image.get_manifest(pfmri) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 554, in get_manifest > m = self._fetch_manifest_with_retries(fmri) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 472, in _fetch_manifest_with_retries > m = self._fetch_manifest(fmri) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 497, in _fetch_manifest > mcontent = retrieve.get_manifest(self, fmri) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/retrieve.py", line 76, in get_manifest > raise NameError, "could not retrieve manifest '%s' from '%s'" % \ > NameError: could not retrieve manifest 'SUNWpython-pyopenssl@0.7%2C5.11-0.96%3A20080829T151256Z' from 'http://pkg.opensolaris.org:80' > pkg: > > This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this > problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the > above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'. > > - twisti > > _______________________________________________ > indiana-discuss mailing list > indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss >
-- Andy http://blog.sartek.net _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Posts:
143
From:
IN
Registered:
9/22/05
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
(build 96)
Posted:
Sep 5, 2008 1:45 AM
in response to: bandy
|
|
+1 Me too
-Siva
Andras Barna wrote: > same here > > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Christian Thalinger > <twisti at complang dot tuwien dot ac dot at> wrote: > >> On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 13:46 -0700, David dot Comay at Sun dot COM wrote: >> >>> The OpenSolaris development package repository >>> >>> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/ >>> >>> has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_96 including major fixes >>> to the Caiman "Slim Install" and the Image Packaging System (IPS). In >>> addition, NetBeans 6.1 is now available in the repository. >>> >> I get this error: >> >> root@workstation:~# pkg refresh >> root@workstation:~# pkg info -r SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95 >> Name: SUNWipkg >> Summary: >> State: Not installed >> Authority: opensolaris.org (preferred) >> Version: 0.5.11 >> Build Release: 5.11 >> Branch: 0.95 >> Packaging Date: Fri Aug 29 15:16:54 2008 >> Size: 1.5 MB >> FMRI: pkg:/SUNWipkg@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080829T151654Z >> root@workstation:~# pkg install SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95 >> Creating Plan -Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1734, in ? >> ret = main_func() >> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1698, in main_func >> return install(img, pargs) >> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 601, in install >> filters = filters, verbose = verbose, noexecute = noexecute) >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 1704, in make_install_plan >> ip.evaluate() >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 354, in evaluate >> self.evaluate_fmri(f) >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 283, in evaluate_fmri >> self.evaluate_fmri(cf) >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 206, in evaluate_fmri >> m = self.image.get_manifest(pfmri) >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 554, in get_manifest >> m = self._fetch_manifest_with_retries(fmri) >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 472, in _fetch_manifest_with_retries >> m = self._fetch_manifest(fmri) >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 497, in _fetch_manifest >> mcontent = retrieve.get_manifest(self, fmri) >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/retrieve.py", line 76, in get_manifest >> raise NameError, "could not retrieve manifest '%s' from '%s'" % \ >> NameError: could not retrieve manifest 'SUNWpython-pyopenssl@0.7%2C5.11-0.96%3A20080829T151256Z' from 'http://pkg.opensolaris.org:80' >> pkg: >> >> This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this >> problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the >> above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'. >> >> - twisti >> >> _______________________________________________ >> indiana-discuss mailing list >> indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Posts:
962
From:
US
Registered:
3/9/05
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
(build 96)
Posted:
Sep 5, 2008 2:05 AM
in response to: twisti
|
|
>> The OpenSolaris development package repository >> >> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/ >> >> has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_96 including major fixes >> to the Caiman "Slim Install" and the Image Packaging System (IPS). In >> addition, NetBeans 6.1 is now available in the repository.
> I get this error: > > root@workstation:~# pkg refresh > root@workstation:~# pkg info -r SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95 > Name: SUNWipkg > Summary: > State: Not installed > Authority: opensolaris.org (preferred) > Version: 0.5.11 > Build Release: 5.11 > Branch: 0.95 > Packaging Date: Fri Aug 29 15:16:54 2008 > Size: 1.5 MB > FMRI: pkg:/SUNWipkg@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080829T151654Z > root@workstation:~# pkg install SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95 > Creating Plan -Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1734, in ? > ret = main_func() > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1698, in main_func > return install(img, pargs) > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 601, in install > filters = filters, verbose = verbose, noexecute = noexecute) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 1704, in make_install_plan > ip.evaluate() > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 354, in evaluate > self.evaluate_fmri(f) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 283, in evaluate_fmri > self.evaluate_fmri(cf) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 206, in evaluate_fmri > m = self.image.get_manifest(pfmri) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 554, in get_manifest > m = self._fetch_manifest_with_retries(fmri) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 472, in _fetch_manifest_with_retries > m = self._fetch_manifest(fmri) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 497, in _fetch_manifest > mcontent = retrieve.get_manifest(self, fmri) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/retrieve.py", line 76, in get_manifest > raise NameError, "could not retrieve manifest '%s' from '%s'" % \ > NameError: could not retrieve manifest 'SUNWpython-pyopenssl@0.7%2C5.11-0.96%3A20080829T151256Z' from 'http://pkg.opensolaris.org:80' > pkg: > > This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this > problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the > above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
Can you please provide the output of "pkg version"?
dsc _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Posts:
74
From:
AT
Registered:
5/27/08
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
(build 96)
Posted:
Sep 5, 2008 2:26 AM
in response to: comay
|
|
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 02:05 -0700, David dot Comay at Sun dot COM wrote: > Can you please provide the output of "pkg version"?
Sure:
$ pkg version 093ca22da67c
- twisti
_______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Posts:
353
From:
RO
Registered:
2/16/07
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
(build 96)
Posted:
Sep 5, 2008 2:27 AM
in response to: comay
|
|
093ca22da67c
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:05 PM, <David dot Comay at sun dot com> wrote: >>> The OpenSolaris development package repository >>> >>> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/ >>> >>> has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_96 including major fixes >>> to the Caiman "Slim Install" and the Image Packaging System (IPS). In >>> addition, NetBeans 6.1 is now available in the repository. > >> I get this error: >> >> root@workstation:~# pkg refresh >> root@workstation:~# pkg info -r SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95 >> Name: SUNWipkg >> Summary: >> State: Not installed >> Authority: opensolaris.org (preferred) >> Version: 0.5.11 >> Build Release: 5.11 >> Branch: 0.95 >> Packaging Date: Fri Aug 29 15:16:54 2008 >> Size: 1.5 MB >> FMRI: pkg:/SUNWipkg@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080829T151654Z >> root@workstation:~# pkg install SUNWipkg@0.5.11-0.95 >> Creating Plan -Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1734, in ? >> ret = main_func() >> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1698, in main_func >> return install(img, pargs) >> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 601, in install >> filters = filters, verbose = verbose, noexecute = noexecute) >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 1704, in make_install_plan >> ip.evaluate() >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 354, in evaluate >> self.evaluate_fmri(f) >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 283, in evaluate_fmri >> self.evaluate_fmri(cf) >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 206, in evaluate_fmri >> m = self.image.get_manifest(pfmri) >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 554, in get_manifest >> m = self._fetch_manifest_with_retries(fmri) >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 472, in _fetch_manifest_with_retries >> m = self._fetch_manifest(fmri) >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/image.py", line 497, in _fetch_manifest >> mcontent = retrieve.get_manifest(self, fmri) >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/retrieve.py", line 76, in get_manifest >> raise NameError, "could not retrieve manifest '%s' from '%s'" % \ >> NameError: could not retrieve manifest 'SUNWpython-pyopenssl@0.7%2C5.11-0.96%3A20080829T151256Z' from 'http://pkg.opensolaris.org:80' >> pkg: >> >> This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this >> problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the >> above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'. > > Can you please provide the output of "pkg version"? > > dsc > _______________________________________________ > indiana-discuss mailing list > indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss >
-- Andy http://blog.sartek.net _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Posts:
81
From:
GB
Registered:
6/3/08
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
bug
Posted:
Sep 5, 2008 3:28 AM
in response to: bandy
|
|
Haven't noticed anyone reporting this issue yet.
DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB) SUNWthunderbird 612/613 0/13 0.00/5.19 PHASE ACTIONS Removal Phase 10399/10399 Install Phase 9091/9091 Update Phase 21074/95737 Action upgrade failed for 'var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' (pkg:/SUNWcs): OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmpvodwQc/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' pkg: An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmpvodwQc/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at /tmp/tmpvodwQc should you wish to inspect it. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ? ret = main_func() File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func return image_update(img, pargs) File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update img.imageplan.execute() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 615, in execute p.execute_update(src, dest) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py", line 270, in execute_update dest.install(self, src) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line 145, in install os.chmod(temp, mode) OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmpvodwQc/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' pkg:
This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'. -bash-3.2# pkg version bfe78d71dc9a
Please, consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
_______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Posts:
81
From:
GB
Registered:
6/3/08
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
bug
Posted:
Sep 5, 2008 3:53 AM
in response to: imavrouk
|
|
Argh saw that this is...
inetd_generic.xml is a softlink onto itself..
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote: > Haven't noticed anyone reporting this issue yet. > > DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER > (MB) > SUNWthunderbird 612/613 0/13 > 0.00/5.19 PHASE ACTIONS > Removal Phase 10399/10399 > Install Phase 9091/9091 > Update Phase 21074/95737 Action upgrade > failed for 'var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' (pkg:/SUNWcs): > OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path > name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: > '/tmp/tmpvodwQc/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' > pkg: > An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 90] Number of > symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds > MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmpvodwQc/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' > The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made > to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted > at /tmp/tmpvodwQc should you wish to inspect it. > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ? > ret = main_func() > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func > return image_update(img, pargs) > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update > img.imageplan.execute() > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", > line 615, in execute > p.execute_update(src, dest) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py", line > 270, in execute_update > dest.install(self, src) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line > 145, in install > os.chmod(temp, mode) > OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path > name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: > '/tmp/tmpvodwQc/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' > pkg: > > This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this > problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including > the > above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'. > -bash-3.2# pkg version > bfe78d71dc9a > > > > Please, consider the environment before printing this e-mail. > > > _______________________________________________ > indiana-discuss mailing list > indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss > _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Posts:
698
From:
GB
Registered:
4/27/05
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] [pkg-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package
repository update bug
Posted:
Sep 7, 2008 5:34 AM
in response to: imavrouk
|
|
Hello Yiannis,
Friday, September 5, 2008, 11:53:49 AM, you wrote:
YM> Argh saw that this is...
YM> inetd_generic.xml is a softlink onto itself..
Still pkg should report a nice warning/error message in such a case.
-- Best regards, Robert Milkowski mailto:milek at task dot gda dot pl http://milek.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Posts:
1,253
From:
Registered:
3/9/05
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] [pkg-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org
package repository update (build 96)
Posted:
Sep 5, 2008 7:30 AM
in response to: comay
|
|
There was a hiccup yesterday where one of the mirrors didn't have all the latest packages, but you could still get a catalog from one of the servers that knew about all of them. See bug 3254. That's been fixed now, so if that was your problem, then trying again should resolve the issue.
Thanks, Danek _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Posts:
698
From:
GB
Registered:
4/27/05
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] [pkg-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package
repository update (build 96)
Posted:
Sep 7, 2008 5:26 AM
in response to: dduvall
|
|
Hello Danek,
Friday, September 5, 2008, 3:30:06 PM, you wrote:
DD> There was a hiccup yesterday where one of the mirrors didn't have all the DD> latest packages, but you could still get a catalog from one of the servers DD> that knew about all of them. See bug 3254. That's been fixed now, so if DD> that was your problem, then trying again should resolve the issue.
Nevertheless IMHO pkg should provide nice error message instead of all that python messages which end user won't understand.
-- Best regards, Robert Milkowski mailto:milek at task dot gda dot pl http://milek.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Shawn Walker
swalker@opensolaris....
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] [pkg-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org
package repository update (build 96)
Posted:
Sep 7, 2008 2:13 PM
in response to: milek
|
|
Robert Milkowski wrote: > Hello Danek, > > Friday, September 5, 2008, 3:30:06 PM, you wrote: > > DD> There was a hiccup yesterday where one of the mirrors didn't have all the > DD> latest packages, but you could still get a catalog from one of the servers > DD> that knew about all of them. See bug 3254. That's been fixed now, so if > DD> that was your problem, then trying again should resolve the issue. > > > Nevertheless IMHO pkg should provide nice error message instead of all > that python messages which end user won't understand.
...and we agree with that. We have several long term bug entries open about changing the client to provide more friendly responses.
-- Shawn Walker _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Posts:
986
From:
IE
Registered:
7/14/05
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] [pkg-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package
repository update (build 96)
Posted:
Sep 7, 2008 3:38 PM
in response to: Shawn Walker
|
|
On 7 Sep 2008, at 22:13, Shawn Walker wrote:
> Robert Milkowski wrote: >> >> that python messages which end user won't understand. > > ...and we agree with that. We have several long term bug entries open > about changing the client to provide more friendly responses.
Every time I read about software in this day and age where basic interactions with the user are regarded as "stuff to fix later", my hair turns a little more grey :) :(
Cheeri, Calum.
-- CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland mailto:calum dot benson at sun dot com GNOME Desktop Team http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771
Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
_______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Shawn Walker
swalker@opensolaris....
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] [pkg-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package
repository update (build 96)
Posted:
Sep 7, 2008 4:22 PM
in response to: calumb
|
|
Calum Benson wrote: > On 7 Sep 2008, at 22:13, Shawn Walker wrote: > >> Robert Milkowski wrote: >>> that python messages which end user won't understand. >> ...and we agree with that. We have several long term bug entries open >> about changing the client to provide more friendly responses. > > Every time I read about software in this day and age where basic > interactions with the user are regarded as "stuff to fix later", my > hair turns a little more grey :) :(
It is certainly our goal to implement friendly messages ahead of time where possible. For errors we don't specifically handle, a generic message is provided directing a user about what to do (contact us).
However, we still need the "unfriendly" messages when something unexpected happens so we can help them figure out what went wrong.
As I'm sure you're aware, pkg(5) is still under heavy development, so the spit and polish of a fully supported solution isn't yet in place.
Cheers, -- Shawn Walker _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Al Slater
al.slater@scluk.com
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
(build 96)
Posted:
Sep 5, 2008 6:20 AM
in response to: comay
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
This was the result I got from image-update
Al
aslate: /export/home/aslate> pfexec pkg image-update Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date... DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB) Completed 600/600 2570/2570 180.84/180.84
PHASE ACTIONS Removal Phase 3465/3465 Install Phase 3434/3434 Update Phase 91350/91350 PHASE ITEMS Reading Existing Index 8/8 Indexing Packages 1/600pkg: An unexpected error happened during image-update: 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z' The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at /tmp/tmpgeKBsw should you wish to inspect it. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ? ret = main_func() File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func return image_update(img, pargs) File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update img.imageplan.execute() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 662, in execute ind.client_update_index((self.filters, plan_info)) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 677, in client_update_index tmp_index_dir) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 638, in _generic_update_index start_point) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 316, in _process_pkgplan_list self._data_full_fmri.remove_entity( File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/search_storage.py", line 582, in remove_entity self._set.remove(entity) KeyError: 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z' pkg:
This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
aslate: /var/pkg/download> pkg version bfe78d71dc9a
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkjBMiUACgkQz4fTOFL/EDboMACeN5/yVR0CpcLd5W9QvZ2YoDGJ mfMAniZrqsGDLAiWY8ZxYS8IsDTbaaw7 =RQep -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Posts:
23
From:
GR
Registered:
7/15/05
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted:
Sep 5, 2008 3:18 PM
in response to: Al Slater
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
|
|
I tried to update one hour ago and got the same SUNWicdc error as Al Slater.
Message was edited by: gkout
|
|
|
|
Posts:
60
From:
FR
Registered:
8/28/07
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted:
Sep 6, 2008 12:13 AM
in response to: gkout
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
|
|
Hello,
I've successfully upgraded my system, from svn_95 to svn_96, following the instructions which have been provided in the previous posts.
I summarize hereafter the procedure I followed:
* delete the existing /var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml and replace it by an empty file * pfexec pkg refresh --full * pfexec pkg image-update -v * in case of trouble, beadm unmount -f opensolaris-X (the image which has been created) and then beadm destroy -f opensolaris-X * reindex packages pkg build-index * pfexec pkg image-update -v
Well, it can sound odd by any way but it finally worked ...
|
|
|
|
Posts:
476
From:
AU
Registered:
6/14/05
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update (build 96)
Posted:
Sep 6, 2008 7:17 PM
in response to: herrib
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
|
|
just a note that the pkg command is rebuild-index not build-index...
|
|
|
|
Brock Pytlik
bpytlik@sun.com
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
(build 96)
Posted:
Sep 5, 2008 4:37 PM
in response to: Al Slater
|
|
Please try running pkg rebuild-index, then attempt your image update again.
Thanks, Brock
Al Slater wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > This was the result I got from image-update > > Al > > aslate: /export/home/aslate> pfexec pkg image-update > Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date... > DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB) > Completed 600/600 2570/2570 180.84/180.84 > > PHASE ACTIONS > Removal Phase 3465/3465 > Install Phase 3434/3434 > Update Phase 91350/91350 > PHASE ITEMS > Reading Existing Index 8/8 > Indexing Packages 1/600pkg: > An unexpected error happened during image-update: > 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z' > The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made > to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at > /tmp/tmpgeKBsw should you wish to inspect it. > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ? > ret = main_func() > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func > return image_update(img, pargs) > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update > img.imageplan.execute() > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", > line 662, in execute > ind.client_update_index((self.filters, plan_info)) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 677, in > client_update_index > tmp_index_dir) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 638, in > _generic_update_index > start_point) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 316, in > _process_pkgplan_list > self._data_full_fmri.remove_entity( > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/search_storage.py", line > 582, in remove_entity > self._set.remove(entity) > KeyError: 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z' > pkg: > > This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this > problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the > above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'. > > aslate: /var/pkg/download> pkg version > bfe78d71dc9a > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAkjBMiUACgkQz4fTOFL/EDboMACeN5/yVR0CpcLd5W9QvZ2YoDGJ > mfMAniZrqsGDLAiWY8ZxYS8IsDTbaaw7 > =RQep > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > indiana-discuss mailing list > indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss >
_______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Posts:
192
From:
Registered:
2/21/06
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
(build 96)
Posted:
Sep 5, 2008 8:15 PM
in response to: Brock Pytlik
|
|
No Dice. See complete attempt, including the rebuild and so forth: ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg image-update Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date... DOWNLOAD & nbsp; &nb sp; PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
Completed &nbs p; 616/616 530/530 3.43/3.43 PHASE &n bsp; &nbs p; ACTIONS Removal Phase &n bsp; &nbs p; 3514/3514 Install Phase &n bsp; &nbs p; 3462/3462
Update Phase &n bsp; &nbs p; 21273/91793 Action upgrade failed for 'var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' (pkg:/SUNWcs): OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmp58E_R4/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg: An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmp58E_R4/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at /tmp/tmp58E_R4 should you wish to inspect it.
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ? ret = main_func() File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func return image_update(img, pargs) File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
img.imageplan.execute() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 615, in execute p.execute_update(src, dest) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py", line 270, in execute_update
dest.install(self, src) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line 145, in install os.chmod(temp, mode) OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmp58E_R4/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg: This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg rebuild-index PHASE &nb sp;   ; & nbsp; ITEMS Indexing Packages   ; & nbsp; 618/618 ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec beadm list
BE Active Active on Mountpoint Space Name   ; reboot & nbsp; Used ---- ------ --------- ---------- ----- opensolaris-1 no no - 94.25M
opensolaris-2 yes yes / 9.84G opensolaris-3 no no /tmp/tmp58E_R4 224.74M ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec beadm unmount opensolaris-3 ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec beadm destroy opensolaris-3
Are you sure you want to destroy opensolaris-3? This action cannot be undone (y/[n]): y ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg image-update Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date... DOWNLOAD & nbsp; &nb sp; PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
SUNWthunderbird &nbs p; 615/616 0/13 0.00/5.19 PHASE &n bsp; &nbs p; ACTIONS Removal Phase &n bsp; &nbs p; 3514/3514 Install Phase &n bsp; &nbs p; 3462/3462
Update Phase &n bsp; &nbs p; 21282/91793 Action upgrade failed for 'var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' (pkg:/SUNWcs): OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmptZI__D/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg: An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmptZI__D/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at /tmp/tmptZI__D should you wish to inspect it.
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ? ret = main_func() File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func return image_update(img, pargs) File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
img.imageplan.execute() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 615, in execute p.execute_update(src, dest) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py", line 270, in execute_update
dest.install(self, src) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line 145, in install os.chmod(temp, mode) OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmptZI__D/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg: This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Brock Pytlik <bpytlik at sun dot com> wrote:
Please try running pkg rebuild-index, then attempt your image update again.
Thanks,
Brock
Al Slater wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> This was the result I got from image-update
>
> Al
>
> aslate: /export/home/aslate> pfexec pkg image-update
> Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
> DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
> Completed 600/600 2570/2570 180.84/180.84
>
> PHASE ACTIONS
> Removal Phase 3465/3465
> Install Phase 3434/3434
> Update Phase 91350/91350
> PHASE ITEMS
> Reading Existing Index 8/8
> Indexing Packages 1/600pkg:
> An unexpected error happened during image-update:
> 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z'
> The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made
> to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at
> /tmp/tmpgeKBsw should you wish to inspect it.
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
> ret = main_func()
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
> return image_update(img, pargs)
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
> img.imageplan.execute()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py",
> line 662, in execute
> ind.client_update_index((self.filters, plan_info))
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 677, in
> client_update_index
> tmp_index_dir)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 638, in
> _generic_update_index
> start_point)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 316, in
> _process_pkgplan_list
> self._data_full_fmri.remove_entity(
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/search_storage.py", line
> 582, in remove_entity
> self._set.remove(entity)
> KeyError: 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z'
> pkg:
>
> This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
> problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
> above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
>
> aslate: /var/pkg/download> pkg version
> bfe78d71dc9a
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkjBMiUACgkQz4fTOFL/EDboMACeN5/yVR0CpcLd5W9QvZ2YoDGJ
> mfMAniZrqsGDLAiWY8ZxYS8IsDTbaaw7
> =RQep
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> indiana-discuss mailing list
> indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Brock Pytlik
bpytlik@sun.com
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
(build 96)
Posted:
Sep 5, 2008 8:19 PM
in response to: ormandj
|
|
Yes, but this is a different problem.
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3262 is what you're now encountering. Comments 5 and 8 in that bug report have the recommend workarounds.
Brock
David Orman wrote: > No Dice. See complete attempt, including the rebuild and so forth: > > ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg image-update > Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date... > DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB) > Completed 616/616 530/530 > 3.43/3.43 > > PHASE ACTIONS > Removal Phase 3514/3514 > Install Phase 3462/3462 > Update Phase 21273/91793 Action upgrade > failed for 'var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' (pkg:/SUNWcs): > OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path > name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: > '/tmp/tmp58E_R4/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' > pkg: > An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 90] Number of > symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds > MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmp58E_R4/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' > The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only > made to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at > /tmp/tmp58E_R4 should you wish to inspect it. > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ? > ret = main_func() > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func > return image_update(img, pargs) > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update > img.imageplan.execute() > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", > line 615, in execute > p.execute_update(src, dest) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py", > line 270, in execute_update > dest.install(self, src) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line > 145, in install > os.chmod(temp, mode) > OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path > name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: > '/tmp/tmp58E_R4/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' > pkg: > > This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this > problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the > above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'. > ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg rebuild-index > PHASE ITEMS > Indexing Packages 618/618 > ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec beadm list > > BE Active Active on Mountpoint Space > Name reboot Used > ---- ------ --------- ---------- ----- > opensolaris-1 no no - 94.25M > opensolaris-2 yes yes / 9.84G > opensolaris-3 no no /tmp/tmp58E_R4 224.74M > ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec beadm unmount opensolaris-3 > ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec beadm destroy opensolaris-3 > Are you sure you want to destroy opensolaris-3? This action cannot be > undone (y/[n]): > y > ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg image-update > Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date... > DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB) > SUNWthunderbird 615/616 0/13 > 0.00/5.19 PHASE ACTIONS > Removal Phase 3514/3514 > Install Phase 3462/3462 > Update Phase 21282/91793 Action upgrade > failed for 'var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' (pkg:/SUNWcs): > OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path > name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: > '/tmp/tmptZI__D/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' > pkg: > An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 90] Number of > symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds > MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmptZI__D/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' > The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only > made to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at > /tmp/tmptZI__D should you wish to inspect it. > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ? > ret = main_func() > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func > return image_update(img, pargs) > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update > img.imageplan.execute() > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", > line 615, in execute > p.execute_update(src, dest) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py", > line 270, in execute_update > dest.install(self, src) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line > 145, in install > os.chmod(temp, mode) > OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path > name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: > '/tmp/tmptZI__D/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' > pkg: > > This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this > problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the > above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'. > ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ > > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Brock Pytlik <bpytlik at sun dot com > <mailto:bpytlik at sun dot com>> wrote: > > Please try running pkg rebuild-index, then attempt your image > update again. > > Thanks, > Brock > > Al Slater wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > This was the result I got from image-update > > > > Al > > > > aslate: /export/home/aslate> pfexec pkg image-update > > Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date... > > DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES > XFER (MB) > > Completed 600/600 2570/2570 > 180.84/180.84 > > > > PHASE ACTIONS > > Removal Phase 3465/3465 > > Install Phase 3434/3434 > > Update Phase 91350/91350 > > PHASE ITEMS > > Reading Existing Index 8/8 > > Indexing Packages 1/600pkg: > > An unexpected error happened during image-update: > > 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z' > > The running system has not been modified. Modifications were > only made > > to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at > > /tmp/tmpgeKBsw should you wish to inspect it. > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ? > > ret = main_func() > > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func > > return image_update(img, pargs) > > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update > > img.imageplan.execute() > > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", > > line 662, in execute > > ind.client_update_index((self.filters, plan_info)) > > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line > 677, in > > client_update_index > > tmp_index_dir) > > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line > 638, in > > _generic_update_index > > start_point) > > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line > 316, in > > _process_pkgplan_list > > self._data_full_fmri.remove_entity( > > File > "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/search_storage.py", line > > 582, in remove_entity > > self._set.remove(entity) > > KeyError: 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z' > > pkg: > > > > This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this > > problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and > including the > > above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'. > > > > aslate: /var/pkg/download> pkg version > > bfe78d71dc9a > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS) > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > > > iEYEARECAAYFAkjBMiUACgkQz4fTOFL/EDboMACeN5/yVR0CpcLd5W9QvZ2YoDGJ > > mfMAniZrqsGDLAiWY8ZxYS8IsDTbaaw7 > > =RQep > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > indiana-discuss mailing list > > indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org > <mailto:indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org> > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > indiana-discuss mailing list > indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org > <mailto:indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Posts:
192
From:
Registered:
2/21/06
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
(build 96)
Posted:
Sep 5, 2008 9:43 PM
in response to: Brock Pytlik
|
|
This worked, thank you. On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Brock Pytlik <bpytlik at sun dot com> wrote:
Yes, but this is a different problem.
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3262 is what you're now encountering. Comments 5 and 8 in that bug report have the recommend workarounds.
Brock
David Orman wrote:
No Dice. See complete attempt, including the rebuild and so forth:
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg image-update
Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
Completed 616/616 530/530 3.43/3.43
PHASE ACTIONS
Removal Phase 3514/3514
Install Phase 3462/3462
Update Phase 21273/91793 Action upgrade failed for 'var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' (pkg:/SUNWcs):
OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmp58E_R4/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg:
An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmp58E_R4/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at /tmp/tmp58E_R4 should you wish to inspect it.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
ret = main_func()
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
return image_update(img, pargs)
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
img.imageplan.execute()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 615, in execute
p.execute_update(src, dest)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py", line 270, in execute_update
dest.install(self, src)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line 145, in install
os.chmod(temp, mode)
OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmp58E_R4/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg:
This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg rebuild-index
PHASE ITEMS
Indexing Packages 618/618
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec beadm list
BE Active Active on Mountpoint Space
Name reboot Used ---- ------ --------- ---------- -----
opensolaris-1 no no - 94.25M
opensolaris-2 yes yes / 9.84G
opensolaris-3 no no /tmp/tmp58E_R4 224.74M
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec beadm unmount opensolaris-3
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec beadm destroy opensolaris-3
Are you sure you want to destroy opensolaris-3? This action cannot be undone (y/[n]):
y
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$ pfexec pkg image-update
Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
SUNWthunderbird 615/616 0/13 0.00/5.19 PHASE ACTIONS
Removal Phase 3514/3514
Install Phase 3462/3462
Update Phase 21282/91793 Action upgrade failed for 'var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml' (pkg:/SUNWcs):
OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmptZI__D/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg:
An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmptZI__D/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at /tmp/tmptZI__D should you wish to inspect it.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
ret = main_func()
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
return image_update(img, pargs)
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
img.imageplan.execute()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 615, in execute
p.execute_update(src, dest)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py", line 270, in execute_update
dest.install(self, src)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line 145, in install
os.chmod(temp, mode)
OSError: [Errno 90] Number of symbolic links encountered during path name traversal exceeds MAXSYMLINKS: '/tmp/tmptZI__D/var/svc/profile/inetd_generic.xml'
pkg:
This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the
above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
ormandj@opensolaris-ormandj:~$
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Brock Pytlik < bpytlik at sun dot com <mailto: bpytlik at sun dot com>> wrote:
Please try running pkg rebuild-index, then attempt your image
update again.
Thanks,
Brock
Al Slater wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> This was the result I got from image-update
>
> Al
>
> aslate: /export/home/aslate> pfexec pkg image-update
> Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
> DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
> Completed 600/600 2570/2570
180.84/180.84
>
> PHASE ACTIONS
> Removal Phase 3465/3465
> Install Phase 3434/3434
> Update Phase 91350/91350
> PHASE ITEMS
> Reading Existing Index 8/8
> Indexing Packages 1/600pkg:
> An unexpected error happened during image-update:
> 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z'
> The running system has not been modified. Modifications were
only made
> to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at
> /tmp/tmpgeKBsw should you wish to inspect it.
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ?
> ret = main_func()
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func
> return image_update(img, pargs)
> File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update
> img.imageplan.execute()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py",
> line 662, in execute
> ind.client_update_index((self.filters, plan_info))
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line
677, in
> client_update_index
> tmp_index_dir)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line
638, in
> _generic_update_index
> start_point)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line
316, in
> _process_pkgplan_list
> self._data_full_fmri.remove_entity(
> File
"/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/search_storage.py", line
> 582, in remove_entity
> self._set.remove(entity)
> KeyError: 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z'
> pkg:
>
> This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this
> problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and
including the
> above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'.
>
> aslate: /var/pkg/download> pkg version
> bfe78d71dc9a
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkjBMiUACgkQz4fTOFL/EDboMACeN5/yVR0CpcLd5W9QvZ2YoDGJ
> mfMAniZrqsGDLAiWY8ZxYS8IsDTbaaw7
> =RQep
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> indiana-discuss mailing list
> indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
<mailto:indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org>
<mailto:indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org>
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Al Slater
al.slater@scluk.com
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
(build 96)
Posted:
Sep 6, 2008 1:57 AM
in response to: Brock Pytlik
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Brock Pytlik wrote: > Please try running pkg rebuild-index, then attempt your image update again.
Yep, that fixed it. Thanks.
> Al Slater wrote: > This was the result I got from image-update > > Al > > aslate: /export/home/aslate> pfexec pkg image-update > Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date... > DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB) > Completed 600/600 2570/2570 180.84/180.84 > > PHASE ACTIONS > Removal Phase 3465/3465 > Install Phase 3434/3434 > Update Phase 91350/91350 > PHASE ITEMS > Reading Existing Index 8/8 > Indexing Packages 1/600pkg: > An unexpected error happened during image-update: > 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z' > The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made > to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at > /tmp/tmpgeKBsw should you wish to inspect it. > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ? > ret = main_func() > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func > return image_update(img, pargs) > File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update > img.imageplan.execute() > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", > line 662, in execute > ind.client_update_index((self.filters, plan_info)) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 677, in > client_update_index > tmp_index_dir) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 638, in > _generic_update_index > start_point) > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py", line 316, in > _process_pkgplan_list > self._data_full_fmri.remove_entity( > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/search_storage.py", line > 582, in remove_entity > self._set.remove(entity) > KeyError: 'pkg:/SUNWicdc@0.5.11,5.11-0.95:20080807T160140Z' > pkg: > > This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this > problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the > above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'. > > aslate: /var/pkg/download> pkg version > bfe78d71dc9a -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkjCRfYACgkQz4fTOFL/EDYWggCdHImUHlEPOF1fbZQ2aLGnW/5S yo4AnjIVC1mtOwkYfyG5/C/z3ef14PZf =xLfX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris dot org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
|
|
|
|
Posts:
45
From:
Registered:
3/24/08
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
Posted:
Sep 6, 2008 9:19 PM
in response to: comay
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
|
|
Hi, I tried to update and I got the following error:
-bash-3.2$ pfexec pkg image-update Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date... DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB) SUNWthunderbird 640/641 0/13 0.00/5.19 PHASE ACTIONS Removal Phase 10491/10491 Install Phase 9161/9161 Update Phase 65062/126123 Action upgrade failed for 'kernel/drv/bnx.conf' (pkg:/BRCMbnx): OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory pkg: An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 2] No such file or directory The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at /tmp/tmpYwzZCn should you wish to inspect it. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1830, in ? ret = main_func() File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1792, in main_func return image_update(img, pargs) File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 537, in image_update img.imageplan.execute() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py", line 615, in execute p.execute_update(src, dest) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/client/pkgplan.py", line 270, in execute_update dest.install(self, src) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line 166, in install portable.rename(temp, final_path) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/portable/os_unix.py", line 169, in rename os.rename(src, dst) OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory pkg:
This is an internal error, please let the developers know about this problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the above traceback and the output of 'pkg version'. -bash-3.2$ pkg version bfe78d71dc9a
|
|
|
|
Posts:
2,177
From:
US
Registered:
6/24/05
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
Posted:
Sep 7, 2008 10:54 AM
in response to: joschang
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
|
|
I was able to image-update to b96 in one machine (from B91), but have no luck in two other machines with different update histories.
Running out of patience, I installed the B96 LiveDVD in one of the machines, but it introduced other problems (relating to Java and OpenOffice.org, etc.)
It appears that something is terribly broken. I think we are getting close to the 2008.11 release date, lots of activities are going on and thus lots of regressions. Coming from the Linux world, this is totally normal.
My advice is, if you have problems updating to B96, don't be frustrated, and, more importantly, don't force it. Be patient and boot back to the previous BE. Thanks to ZFS, back-booting is a painless process.
|
|
|
|
Posts:
595
From:
Registered:
3/12/08
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
Posted:
Sep 7, 2008 4:03 PM
in response to: waynel
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
|
|
@waynel: if the problem is the same as above - i.e. the error with inetd_generic.xml - then this is due to a bug in build 95. If you skip build 95, you should be OK. The workaround is detailed in this forum thread on opensolaris.org (not sure if your on the mailing list) and here:
http://sites.google.com/site/solarium/how-to-update-opensolaris
Cheers
Andrew.
|
|
|
|
Posts:
2,177
From:
US
Registered:
6/24/05
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
Posted:
Sep 7, 2008 5:24 PM
in response to: andrewk8
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
|
|
> @waynel: if the problem is the same as above - i.e. > the error with inetd_generic.xml - then this is due > to a bug in build 95. If you skip build 95, you > should be OK. The workaround is detailed in this > forum thread on opensolaris.org (not sure if your on > the mailing list) and here: > > http://sites.google.com/site/solarium/how-to-update-op > ensolaris > > Cheers > > Andrew.
Thanks, Andrew.
Yes, I was able to overcome this problem and image-update to b96. But thereafter I was not able to boot, and had to go back to b95.
In another machine, I was not able to do the "pkg install SUNWipkg" and did the stupid thing of uninstalling it--and the rest is history.
I think there are a myriad of problems with IPS, which is currently going thru an accelerated genesis. Of course we have an obligation to go thru each build, but make sure that we are not doing that on our primary machines.
|
|
|
|
Posts:
595
From:
Registered:
3/12/08
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
Posted:
Sep 8, 2008 5:23 AM
in response to: waynel
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
|
|
> Yes, I was able to overcome this problem and > image-update to b96. But thereafter I was not able > to boot, and had to go back to b95.
Were you able to boot the original Boot Environment for build 95?
Thanks
Andrew.
|
|
|
|
Posts:
2,177
From:
US
Registered:
6/24/05
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
Posted:
Sep 8, 2008 9:24 AM
in response to: andrewk8
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
|
|
> > Yes, I was able to overcome this problem and > > image-update to b96. But thereafter I was not > able > > to boot, and had to go back to b95. > > Were you able to boot the original Boot Environment > for build 95? > > Thanks > > Andrew.
Yes. (Why are you asking?)
|
|
|
|
Posts:
595
From:
Registered:
3/12/08
|
|
|
|
Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg.opensolaris.org package repository update
Posted:
Sep 9, 2008 3:43 AM
in response to: waynel
To: Projects » indiana » discuss
|
|
> > Were you able to boot the original Boot > Environment > > for build 95? > > > > Thanks > > > > Andrew. > > Yes. (Why are you asking?)
Because if it is trashing your old BE then this is a bigger problem, and should be reported to the appropriate team. Luckily that wasn't the case. :-)
Cheers
Andrew.
|
|
|
|
|