|
|
AnnouncementsAnnouncements from the porting worldas(1) for x86 platforms finaly redistributable | 03/28/2008Knowledgable eyes have found this: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=896 saying: Description From David Comay 2008-03-28 15:45:35 We're now able to allow as(1) to be redistributed on the x86 Woooooohoooooo SSGD based developer platform in the works ? | 03/17/2008Rumor has it that the guys at blastwave have a SSGD based platform developers will be able to use in the works. Happy days for porters I would say. Stay tuned for more News and Announcements from there.. New Openolaris Social Network Site in the works ? | 03/14/2008Rumor has it that Dennis Clarke, the founder and admin at Blastwave.org is setting up a large Sun Secure Global Desktop based social network service for OpenSolaris community people to use. There are test people lining up for this so if you want to be a test phase person then drop Dennis Clarke a line at dclarke at blastwave dot org and he will get you a zone and a desktop and all the tools you could ask for. Membership rules posted | 03/11/2008We posted the rules to become a contributor/core contributor to our community. Most of it was shamelessly copied by me from the testers community who have done an extremely good job at their guidelines. Thanks for the great input guys. OpenSolaris Software Porters Community granted | 03/06/2008Based on the initial motion to the OGB and the following comments: Shawn Walker wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Michal Bielicki <michal dot bielicki at voiceworks dot pl> wrote: I am not saying that we don't want to influence the developers to make their stuff more compatible, I am just saying that we in no way want to try to convince blastwave for example to change their dependency model as some other people would liek to do. Port like you see fit, we want to create a community that will try to help with knowhow, links, pointers, tools etc fr you to be able to do your stuff your way. Likewise, you may need to add additional pieces to it to accommodate SMF, ZFS, etc. Yes, my original sentence is probably less clear :)
That depends. The initial idea is to get more people to do porting, and make porting easier. If it comes to distribution, yes we where thinking of a cg repo, as well as getting some people to sponsor cpu cycles for testing and packaging for example. On the other hand if a porter is part of SFE, blastwave, sunfreeware.org he probably prefers his results there, which is fine with us. We want to help him get his port done and publish his experiences on our portal so that the next guy will have it easier if he chooses to take the same approach. We DONT want to tell people, hey this is the only right way. We rather want to say, ok you can use our ressources, but hey we will help and encourage you the same should you choose any of the non opensolaris.org core porting projects. Or is the intent here to state that this CG does not perform any of the actual porting work? It would be more like the umbrella that keeps the info, ressources and knowhow pooled for all the porting efforts, and help others join. Its a bit like merging porters per se and porting advcacy int a central space while trying to keep everybody happy, which of course will be tricky but is the right way to go. THe ultimate would of course be to merge all the projects that create larger porting work into one, but I am not sure if that is necessary if we create a central space that links to all of them and is the platform of communication and knowhow ressources for all of them.
me for the time being, until the core group would elect someone. If you can clarify the purpose of this CG a bit further; I would be willing to vote in favour of it. I ope I clarified it a bit. My reply took a bit longer cause I was at FOSDEM and only touched my notebook between 5-8 am for the last days :) I just need to know if the purpose of this CG is to actually sponsor projects to do porting work, or if it merely seeks to coordinate the efforts of other CGs. Its more a CG that would create a lot of projects. That is one of the reasons I saw it more as a community while also the coordinatin work, ie information exchange, discussion platform etc would interact for sure with any ther community that involve itself into porting so it would hardly fit one single community as a project. If the latter; then this CG might be better done as a project of an existing CG instead of as its own CG. We have been granted a Software Porters community. Happy 0 Birthday to the Software Porters community |